BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 127clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi446Mumbai406Bangalore145Karnataka107Jaipur85Hyderabad82Kolkata80Chandigarh74Cochin64Ahmedabad62Chennai44Raipur35Indore28Pune19Patna15Lucknow15Visakhapatnam14Cuttack13Surat11Jodhpur9Guwahati7Panaji6Varanasi5Nagpur4Agra4Rajkot4Allahabad4SC3Amritsar1Dehradun1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 253(3)15Section 143(3)9Section 1543Condonation of Delay3Rectification u/s 1543

M/S MILLENIUM CONSULTANTS& SERVICE PROVIDERS,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 138/ALLD/2010[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

TDS with the Government. 27. A proviso which is inserted to remedy unintended consequences and to make the provision workable, a proviso which supplies an obvious omission in the Section, is required to be read into the Section to give the Section a reasonable interpretation and requires to be treated as retrospective in operation so that a reasonable interpretation

TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3) , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 19/ALLD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad14 Oct 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao& Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Ms. Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 253(3)

127 Interest provided on U.P. Safety Glass 5,90,985.59 Page 126 I.C.D. upto 31.03.2011 73,01,827.59 5.2 The ld. CIT(A) rejected the contentions of the assessee and upheld the additions to the income made by the AO vide assessment order dated 27.03.2015 u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act passed by Assessing Officer , by holding as under

TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 21/ALLD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad14 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao& Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Ms. Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 253(3)

127 Interest provided on U.P. Safety Glass 5,90,985.59 Page 126 I.C.D. upto 31.03.2011 73,01,827.59 5.2 The ld. CIT(A) rejected the contentions of the assessee and upheld the additions to the income made by the AO vide assessment order dated 27.03.2015 u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act passed by Assessing Officer , by holding as under

TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 20/ALLD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad14 Oct 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao& Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Ms. Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 253(3)

127 Interest provided on U.P. Safety Glass 5,90,985.59 Page 126 I.C.D. upto 31.03.2011 73,01,827.59 5.2 The ld. CIT(A) rejected the contentions of the assessee and upheld the additions to the income made by the AO vide assessment order dated 27.03.2015 u/s 143(3) of the 1961 Act passed by Assessing Officer , by holding as under