Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

29 results for “TDS”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,107 Mumbai1,857 Bangalore682 Pune611 Chennai535 Ahmedabad386 Kolkata362 Hyderabad324 Jaipur318 Indore233 Raipur214 Chandigarh190 Karnataka151 Cochin137 Nagpur117 Surat109 Visakhapatnam102 Cuttack94 Jabalpur94 Rajkot84 Lucknow61 Dehradun43 Jodhpur34 Guwahati33 Agra31 Amritsar30 Allahabad29 Ranchi24 Panaji23 Patna16 Telangana15 SC13 Varanasi11 Calcutta3 Orissa2 Kerala2

Key Topics

Section 234E36 Penalty28 Section 200A(1)24 Section 200A24 TDS24 Section 271(1)(c)16 Addition to Income15 Charitable Trust12 Section 272A(2)(k)10 Section 154

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION, ALLAHABAD,ALLAHABAD vs. JCIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 178/ALLD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Jaiswal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 154Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS), wrongly and illegally proceeded to impose penalty for non-filing of TDS statements. 4. Because, the appellant has totally

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION, ALLAHABAD,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), ALLAHABAD RANGE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2

10

Section 142(1)7

ITA 182/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Jaiswal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 154Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS), wrongly and illegally proceeded to impose penalty for non-filing of TDS statements. 4. Because, the appellant has totally

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, OFFICE, MINES DIVISION, ALLAHABAD,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), ALLAHABAD RANGE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 181/ALLD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Jaiswal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 154Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS), wrongly and illegally proceeded to impose penalty for non-filing of TDS statements. 4. Because, the appellant has totally

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), ALLAHABAD RANGE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 180/ALLD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Jaiswal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 154Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS), wrongly and illegally proceeded to impose penalty for non-filing of TDS statements. 4. Because, the appellant has totally

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), , ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 179/ALLD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Jaiswal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 154Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS), wrongly and illegally proceeded to impose penalty for non-filing of TDS statements. 4. Because, the appellant has totally

CAREER COACHING (ALLD) PRIVATE LIMITED ,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT ACIT, RANGE - 2, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 62/ALLD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Subhash Malguria & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

TDS and has also paid Rs.4,99,144/- for rate, tax and penalty. The assessee company has paid Rs.2,40,000/- as penalty

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 379/ALLD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

penalty proceedings against the wrong person who is not responsible for the payment or deduction of TDS. Thus, the penalty

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 380/ALLD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

penalty proceedings against the wrong person who is not responsible for the payment or deduction of TDS. Thus, the penalty

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 381/ALLD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

penalty proceedings against the wrong person who is not responsible for the payment or deduction of TDS. Thus, the penalty

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 382/ALLD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

penalty proceedings against the wrong person who is not responsible for the payment or deduction of TDS. Thus, the penalty

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 383/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

penalty proceedings against the wrong person who is not responsible for the payment or deduction of TDS. Thus, the penalty

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CPC (TDS) , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 218/ALLD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 223/ALLD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 224/ALLD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 225/ALLD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 226/ALLD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 227/ALLD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 228/ALLD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 217/ALLD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

ITA 219/ALLD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 Dec 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Tanu Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

penalty by way of fees of Rs. 44602/- under Sec 234E of the Act for latefiling of TDS returns in Form