BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,964Mumbai1,673Bangalore680Chennai526Pune522Kolkata290Ahmedabad249Hyderabad232Jaipur218Raipur201Chandigarh134Visakhapatnam80Nagpur79Indore61Lucknow57Rajkot48Cochin45Cuttack44Surat42Karnataka38Jodhpur37Dehradun30Guwahati24Agra22Patna16Amritsar15Panaji15SC13Jabalpur13Telangana13Ranchi8Allahabad4Calcutta3Orissa2Kerala2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9Penalty4Section 2503Section 1443Section 2713

CAREER COACHING (ALLD) PRIVATE LIMITED ,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT ACIT, RANGE - 2, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 62/ALLD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Subhash Malguria & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

Section 143(3)

TDS and has also paid Rs.4,99,144/- for rate, tax and penalty. The assessee company has paid Rs.2,40,000/- as penalty

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 2(1), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 52/ALLD/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 Oct 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.52, 53 & 54/Alld/2024 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2011-12 Dilshad Husain, Cit(Appeal), National 178, Salreha Pacchim, Sirathu, Vs. Faceless Appeal Centre Allahabad, U.P. Pan:Acbph7430G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Yogeshwar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty, to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide the issue afresh, in accordance with law, after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. 5. In his order dated 22.09.2022, the ld. CIT(A) records that the appellant was given sufficient opportunities and the case was fixed for hearing on three occasions

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 53/ALLD/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 Oct 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.52, 53 & 54/Alld/2024 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2011-12 Dilshad Husain, Cit(Appeal), National 178, Salreha Pacchim, Sirathu, Vs. Faceless Appeal Centre Allahabad, U.P. Pan:Acbph7430G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Yogeshwar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty, to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide the issue afresh, in accordance with law, after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. 5. In his order dated 22.09.2022, the ld. CIT(A) records that the appellant was given sufficient opportunities and the case was fixed for hearing on three occasions

DILSHAD HUSAIN,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT CIR.-1, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 54/ALLD/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.52, 53 & 54/Alld/2024 A.Ys. 2009-10 & 2011-12 Dilshad Husain, Cit(Appeal), National 178, Salreha Pacchim, Sirathu, Vs. Faceless Appeal Centre Allahabad, U.P. Pan:Acbph7430G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Yogeshwar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty, to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide the issue afresh, in accordance with law, after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. 5. In his order dated 22.09.2022, the ld. CIT(A) records that the appellant was given sufficient opportunities and the case was fixed for hearing on three occasions