ITO(TDS),, ALLAHABAD vs. LOK SEWA AYOG,, ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Ito (Tds), V. Public Service Commission 38, M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, (Lok Sewa Aayog), Allahabad,Up Uttar Pradesh, Stanley Road, Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Secretary, V. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Public Service Commission Aaykar Bhawan, (Lok Sewa Aayog), 38, M.G. Marg, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad,Up Stanley Road Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent)

deducted at source on the whole expenditure. It was submitted that if TDS was to be deducted then the requirement

SECRETARY, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTAR PRADESH,ALLAHABAD vs. IT OFFICER, T.D.S., ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Ito (Tds), V. Public Service Commission 38, M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, (Lok Sewa Aayog), Allahabad,Up Uttar Pradesh, Stanley Road, Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Secretary, V. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Public Service Commission Aaykar Bhawan, (Lok Sewa Aayog), 38, M.G. Marg, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad,Up Stanley Road Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent)

deducted at source on the whole expenditure. It was submitted that if TDS was to be deducted then the requirement

ITO(TDS),, ALLAHABAD vs. LOK SEWA AYOG,, ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Ito (Tds), V. Public Service Commission 38, M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, (Lok Sewa Aayog), Allahabad,Up Uttar Pradesh, Stanley Road, Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Secretary, V. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Public Service Commission Aaykar Bhawan, (Lok Sewa Aayog), 38, M.G. Marg, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad,Up Stanley Road Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent)

deducted at source on the whole expenditure. It was submitted that if TDS was to be deducted then the requirement

SECRETARY, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTAR PRADESH,ALLAHABAD vs. IT OFFICER, T.D.S., ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Ito (Tds), V. Public Service Commission 38, M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, (Lok Sewa Aayog), Allahabad,Up Uttar Pradesh, Stanley Road, Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Secretary, V. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), Public Service Commission Aaykar Bhawan, (Lok Sewa Aayog), 38, M.G. Marg, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad,Up Stanley Road Allahabad,Up Tan: Aldl00365B (Appellant) (Respondent)

deducted at source on the whole expenditure. It was submitted that if TDS was to be deducted then the requirement

M/S MILLENIUM CONSULTANTS& SERVICE PROVIDERS,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

deduction from the income in the previous year in which the TDS was deducted. However, when the amount deducted in the form

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION, ALLAHABAD,ALLAHABAD vs. JCIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

TDS and thereby casting any obligation of the assessee to deduct TDS and submit the statement / TDS return in Form

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), , ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

TDS and thereby casting any obligation of the assessee to deduct TDS and submit the statement / TDS return in Form

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, OFFICE, MINES DIVISION, ALLAHABAD,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), ALLAHABAD RANGE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

TDS and thereby casting any obligation of the assessee to deduct TDS and submit the statement / TDS return in Form

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), ALLAHABAD RANGE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

TDS and thereby casting any obligation of the assessee to deduct TDS and submit the statement / TDS return in Form

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION, ALLAHABAD,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), ALLAHABAD RANGE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

TDS and thereby casting any obligation of the assessee to deduct TDS and submit the statement / TDS return in Form

M/S DEORA ELECTRIC WORKS,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both appeals i

deducted TDS under section 194C, over such supply. The assessee also submitted a chart showing the parties that had deducted

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1, ALLAHABAD vs. M/S DEORA ELECTRIC WORKS, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both appeals i

deducted TDS under section 194C, over such supply. The assessee also submitted a chart showing the parties that had deducted

KESARWANI MARKETING(P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS was deducted by the assessee on these payments. It was submitted that the distributors have also not deducted any TDS

M/S KESARWANI MARKETING (P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT (OSD), ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS was deducted by the assessee on these payments. It was submitted that the distributors have also not deducted any TDS

MAHAVIR PRASAD SATISH CHANDRA,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3) , ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year 2013-14

deducted TDS in respect of the payment made to various transporters. The assessee is a partnership firm and engaged in the trading

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

deduction of TDS. 11. The learned DR has further submitted that this fact can otherwise be verified from the TDS

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

deduction of TDS. 11. The learned DR has further submitted that this fact can otherwise be verified from the TDS

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

deduction of TDS. 11. The learned DR has further submitted that this fact can otherwise be verified from the TDS