BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai99Delhi55Chandigarh52Kolkata23Bangalore16Hyderabad15Chennai14Jaipur12Indore8Nagpur6Pune6Ahmedabad5Cuttack3Jodhpur2Visakhapatnam2Cochin1Amritsar1Allahabad1Raipur1SC1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 56(2)(viib)7Addition to Income5Section 56(2)(vii)4Section 56(2)4Section 54B3Section 50C2Section 682Set Off of Losses2

DCIT, CIR-3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. OZONE INDIA LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross objection of the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 2081/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Apr 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Ms. Nupur Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Virendra Ojha, CIT.D.R
Section 56(2)(viib)

56(2)(viib) of the Act on account of difference of net asset value of Rs.54,21,16,156/- credited in the books without appreciating the factual backdrop of the case in which the addition was made by the Assessing Officer. (b) The Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not appreciating the fair market value

UNNATI INORGANICS PVT. LTD.,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(5), , BHAVNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2474/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ahmedabad
11 Sept 2019
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2474/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15)

For Appellant: Surya PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 56(2)(viib)

Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act. ITA No. 2474/Ahd/17 [Unnati Inorganics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO] A.Y. 2014-15 - 3 - 4. Aggrieved by the dispute raised towards FMV of shares contemplated under s.56(2)(viib) of the Act, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) however also did not perceive any merit in the case made

VISHNUBHAI MAFATBHAI DESAI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(4),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2849/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2849/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri S. V. Agrawal, A.R
Section 2(14)Section 49(4)Section 50CSection 54BSection 56Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

viib) Any immovable property:- (i) Without consideration, the stamp duty value of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, the stamp duty value of such property. (ii) For a consideration which is less than the stamp duty value of the property by an amount exceeding fifty thousand rupees. The stamp duty value of such property as exceeds such consideration................. 4. As mentioned

INDUTCH COMPOSITES TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED,VADODARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2004/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Nishit Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri C Dharani Nath, Sr.DR
Section 250Section 56(2)

price and AO-determined FMV as taxable under section 56(2) (vib), instead of restricting it to the excess over the face value, thereby misconstruing the scope and computation mechanism under the provision 7. The order passed by the learned CIT(A) is bad in law as it fails to consider the evidence submitted, denies the appellant the opportunity

SHALBY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1005/AHD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Mar 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R P Rastogi, CIT-D.R
Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(ib)Section 56(2)(vii)Section 56(2)(viib)Section 68

price of Rs. 222.00 per share accordingly value worked to be Rs. 9.60 crores. The assessee submitted that the assessee obtained a fair valuation report whereby fair value of equity of the assessee company worked out by an independent firm of chartered accountant. The assessee company also pointed that section 56(2)(ib) of the Act in respect of additional