BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 35D(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai56Delhi47Ahmedabad27Chennai27Raipur17Bangalore15Cochin9Pune7Kolkata6Rajkot5Hyderabad5Jaipur3Guwahati3Chandigarh3Kerala1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 14A26Disallowance24Addition to Income23Section 143(3)22Section 80I22Section 35D7Transfer Pricing7Section 143(2)6Section 250

ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

Appeal of the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 2035/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedasstt. Sr.No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Vartik Choksi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, C.I.T.DR
Section 143(3)Section 28Section 35Section 92C

section 35D(2)(c)(iv) of the Act. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas the ground of appeal of the revenue is by dismissed. 30.2 In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. Coming to ITA No. 2030/AHD/2016, an appeal by the Revenue for the AY 2011-12 31. The Revenue

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

6
Section 145(2)6
Section 234B6
Deduction6

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI ENTERPRISE LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 523/AHD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section 35D(2)(c)(iv) of the Act. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas the ground of appeal of the revenue is by dismissed. 61.1 In view of the above finding in own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011-12 we hereby set aside the finding of the learned CIT(A) and direct

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 336/AHD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section 35D(2)(c)(iv) of the Act. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas the ground of appeal of the revenue is by dismissed. 61.1 In view of the above finding in own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011-12 we hereby set aside the finding of the learned CIT(A) and direct

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 285/AHD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section 35D(2)(c)(iv) of the Act. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas the ground of appeal of the revenue is by dismissed. 61.1 In view of the above finding in own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011-12 we hereby set aside the finding of the learned CIT(A) and direct

THE DCIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ADANI ENTERPRISE LTD, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is hereby partly allowed

ITA 472/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Respondent: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

section 35D(2)(c)(iv) of the Act. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas the ground of appeal of the revenue is by dismissed. 61.1 In view of the above finding in own case of the assessee for A.Y. 2011-12 we hereby set aside the finding of the learned CIT(A) and direct

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. AIA ENGINEERING LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ITA Appeals 1766/Ahd/12, 2342/Ahd/15, 2343/Ahd/2015,

ITA 1766/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jan 2021AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri T.P. Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

price, under the scheme of the international transfer pricing set out in the Income Tax Act, 1961, can only be done in respect of an 'international transaction'. Section 92(1) provides that, "(a)ny income arising from an international transaction shall be computed having regard to the arm's length price". In order to attract the arm's length price

AIA ENGINEERING LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ITA Appeals 1766/Ahd/12, 2342/Ahd/15, 2343/Ahd/2015,

ITA 1757/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jan 2021AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri T.P. Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr. D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

price, under the scheme of the international transfer pricing set out in the Income Tax Act, 1961, can only be done in respect of an 'international transaction'. Section 92(1) provides that, "(a)ny income arising from an international transaction shall be computed having regard to the arm's length price". In order to attract the arm's length price

KHURANA ENGINEERING LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.(OSD),CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2357/AHD/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Apr 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Madhumita Roya.Y. 2007-08

For Appellant: Sh. S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Sh. ParinFor Respondent: Sh. Chetram Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80I

price that such goods or services would ordinarily fetch in the open market.] (9) Where any amount of profits and gains of an 76[undertaking]or of an enterprise in the case of an assessee is claimed and allowed under this section for any assessment year, deduction to the extent of such profits and gains shall not be allowed under

THE ACIT.(OSD), CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. KHURANA ENGINEERING LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2308/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Apr 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Madhumita Roya.Y. 2007-08

For Appellant: Sh. S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Sh. ParinFor Respondent: Sh. Chetram Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80I

price that such goods or services would ordinarily fetch in the open market.] (9) Where any amount of profits and gains of an 76[undertaking]or of an enterprise in the case of an assessee is claimed and allowed under this section for any assessment year, deduction to the extent of such profits and gains shall not be allowed under

THE ACIT.(OSD), CIRCLE-1,, AHMEDABAD vs. KHURANA ENGINEERING LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

ITA 2352/AHD/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Apr 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Madhumita Roya.Y. 2007-08

For Appellant: Sh. S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Sh. ParinFor Respondent: Sh. Chetram Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80I

price that such goods or services would ordinarily fetch in the open market.] (9) Where any amount of profits and gains of an 76[undertaking]or of an enterprise in the case of an assessee is claimed and allowed under this section for any assessment year, deduction to the extent of such profits and gains shall not be allowed under

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, BARODA vs. M/S. SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD.,, MUMBAI

In the result, the Department’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 741/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)Section 37(1)Section 80Section 80I

Pricing and also much lesser than the prevailing interest rates in the market. It is undisputed fact that based on contractual obligation the late payment of 232 days has attracted the penal interest of Rs.50,16,000/- which is to be allowed u/s.37(1) of the Act. Thus the addition made by the Ld AO on this account is against

SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD.,,MUMBAI vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, BARODA

In the result, the Department’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 712/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)Section 37(1)Section 80Section 80I

Pricing and also much lesser than the prevailing interest rates in the market. It is undisputed fact that based on contractual obligation the late payment of 232 days has attracted the penal interest of Rs.50,16,000/- which is to be allowed u/s.37(1) of the Act. Thus the addition made by the Ld AO on this account is against

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1209/AHD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

c) The AO has treated the loss on account of OFCPN as sham transaction which is unjustified in view of the fact available on record. It is evident from the record that the assessee has invoked securities pledge after passing board resolution thereafter shares of different companies were transferred and in the process several dispute arose which gone upto apex

NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1056/AHD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

c) The AO has treated the loss on account of OFCPN as sham transaction which is unjustified in view of the fact available on record. It is evident from the record that the assessee has invoked securities pledge after passing board resolution thereafter shares of different companies were transferred and in the process several dispute arose which gone upto apex

NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1057/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

c) The AO has treated the loss on account of OFCPN as sham transaction which is unjustified in view of the fact available on record. It is evident from the record that the assessee has invoked securities pledge after passing board resolution thereafter shares of different companies were transferred and in the process several dispute arose which gone upto apex

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1600/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

c) The AO has treated the loss on account of OFCPN as sham transaction which is unjustified in view of the fact available on record. It is evident from the record that the assessee has invoked securities pledge after passing board resolution thereafter shares of different companies were transferred and in the process several dispute arose which gone upto apex

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. NIRMA CHEMICALS WORKS PVT.LTD., AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1208/AHD/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

c) The AO has treated the loss on account of OFCPN as sham transaction which is unjustified in view of the fact available on record. It is evident from the record that the assessee has invoked securities pledge after passing board resolution thereafter shares of different companies were transferred and in the process several dispute arose which gone upto apex

NIRMA CHEMICAL WORKS PVT.LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1190/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate with Shri Parin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 14A

c) The AO has treated the loss on account of OFCPN as sham transaction which is unjustified in view of the fact available on record. It is evident from the record that the assessee has invoked securities pledge after passing board resolution thereafter shares of different companies were transferred and in the process several dispute arose which gone upto apex

BHOGILAL ODHAVJI INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2889/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Smt Madhumita Royआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2889/Ahd/2017 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13) Bhogilal Odhavji Industrial Dcit, बनाम/ Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Circle -1(1), Vs. Asarva Bethak, Asarva, Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad-380 016. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacv 6980 D .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri B. R. Popat, A.R. ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Ms. Vasundhara Upmanya. Cit-D.R.

For Appellant: Shri B. R. Popat, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Vasundhara Upmanya. CIT-D.R
Section 35D

section 35D of the Act; and 2. Confirming the addition of Rs 22,59,10, 459/- made by the AO by treating the entire accounted cost of an immovable property as having been met out of unexplained sources and thereby treating the same as unexplained investment. While adjudicating this ground he ought to have inter alia appreciated the undisputed

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GUJARAT INTERNATIONAL FINANCE TECH-CITY CO. LIMITED, GANDHINAGAR

In the result, both the grounds of appeal of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1177/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Nov 2018AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Ranjan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Dev, Sr. D.R
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 32Section 37Section 37(1)

35D of the Act. I.T.A No. 1177/Ahd/2016 A.Y. 2012-13 Page No 6 DCIT vs. M/s. Gujarat International Finance Tech-City Co. Limited 4. Allowability of Depreciation 41 it is submitted that the Assets used by the Company are used for the purpose of Business and that the assets have been put to use by the Company. Section