Search: transfer pricing

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore19 Bangalore11 Hyderabad8 Jaipur6 Amritsar6 Chandigarh3 Ahmedabad2 Cuttack2 Delhi2 Kolkata1 Mumbai1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 133(6)2 Cash Deposit2 Demonetization2

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. REKHA INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 287/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)

269T. 2. It was also found that out of remaining amount Rs. 45,00,000/- and Rs. 27,00,000/- were paid by Shri Dennis Indravadan Chokshi and Smt Taraben Jagjivandas Chokshi respectively who are son and mother of the Indravadan J Chokshi. I.T.A Nos. 270 & 287/Ahd/2022 A.Y. 2017-18 9 Rekhaben INdravadan Chokshi vs. ITO 3. Further, Shri Dennis

REKHABEN INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 270/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)