BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “transfer pricing”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi54Chennai41Jaipur18Surat16Agra14Jodhpur12Bangalore11Mumbai10Amritsar6Ahmedabad5Hyderabad5Pune4Indore4Cuttack4Kolkata3Lucknow3Chandigarh2Raipur1Rajkot1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 26311Cash Deposit4Section 32A3Demonetization3Addition to Income3Section 133(6)2Section 143(3)2Section 40A(3)2

M/S. GUJARAT AMBUJA EXPORTS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result the order of the Ld

ITA 194/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA (Accountant Member), Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT.DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 263Section 32ASection 35ASection 40A(3)

Transfer Pricing Officer, as the case may be,] shall be deemed to be erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, if, in the opinion of the Principal [Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal] Commissioner or Commissioner,— ITA No. 194/Ahd/2022 [ M/s. Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd. vs. Pr.CIT

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD vs. REKHA INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 287/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)

demonetization period. Another notable facts with respect to the transactions is that the assesee had only made a small cash sales of less than Rs. 2 lacs deliberately with a view to avoid giving PAN details of the so called purchases. Therefore, on appreciation of the entire scheme of things and the findings made by the assessing officer

REKHABEN INDRAVADAN CHOKSHI,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5(2)(4), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 270/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)

demonetization period. Another notable facts with respect to the transactions is that the assesee had only made a small cash sales of less than Rs. 2 lacs deliberately with a view to avoid giving PAN details of the so called purchases. Therefore, on appreciation of the entire scheme of things and the findings made by the assessing officer

H R MOTORS,HIMATNAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1764/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 68

Transfer, Stock Register, Bank Statement and Delivery Challan with customer confirmation. Ld. Counsel also placed before us a compilation of Case Laws on cash deposits during demonetization period. Thus Ld. Counsel argued that without verification of the customers wherein complete address, mobile numbers were given to the assessing officer, who made addition on the advances received of Rs.1.57 crores

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. CHHAGANLAL DALAJI SONI, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 531/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Milin Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr. DR

transfers, and the assessee has not engaged with any parties outside the scope of his business or make cash payments unrelated to his business activities. Acknowledging the volatility in bullion prices, the Counsel for the assessee submitted that there are inherent risks in his business, including instances of losses incurred during the relevant year. The Counsel for the assessee further