Search: section 68

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2365/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

section 88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. (Rs.in) Asstt.Year Amount added back to Amount added the total income back in the total income in previous Asstt.Year 2005-06 Rs.31,565/- Rs.6,02,99,64/- 2006-07 Rs.NIL Rs.31,565/- 2007-08 Rs.27,58,400/- - 2008-09 Rs.10,19,61,651/- Rs.27

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA vs. GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LTD.,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2546/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

section 88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. (Rs.in) Asstt.Year Amount added back to Amount added the total income back in the total income in previous Asstt.Year 2005-06 Rs.31,565/- Rs.6,02,99,64/- 2006-07 Rs.NIL Rs.31,565/- 2007-08 Rs.27,58,400/- - 2008-09 Rs.10,19,61,651/- Rs.27

THA ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA vs. M/S. GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED.,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 106/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

section 88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. (Rs.in) Asstt.Year Amount added back to Amount added the total income back in the total income in previous Asstt.Year 2005-06 Rs.31,565/- Rs.6,02,99,64/- 2006-07 Rs.NIL Rs.31,565/- 2007-08 Rs.27,58,400/- - 2008-09 Rs.10,19,61,651/- Rs.27

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1,, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 116/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

section 88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. (Rs.in) Asstt.Year Amount added back to Amount added the total income back in the total income in previous Asstt.Year 2005-06 Rs.31,565/- Rs.6,02,99,64/- 2006-07 Rs.NIL Rs.31,565/- 2007-08 Rs.27,58,400/- - 2008-09 Rs.10,19,61,651/- Rs.27

THE ADDL.CIT, RANGE-1, BARODA vs. GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMEICALS LTD, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 548/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

section 88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. (Rs.in) Asstt.Year Amount added back to Amount added the total income back in the total income in previous Asstt.Year 2005-06 Rs.31,565/- Rs.6,02,99,64/- 2006-07 Rs.NIL Rs.31,565/- 2007-08 Rs.27,58,400/- - 2008-09 Rs.10,19,61,651/- Rs.27

GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMEICALS LTD,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 135/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

section 88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. (Rs.in) Asstt.Year Amount added back to Amount added the total income back in the total income in previous Asstt.Year 2005-06 Rs.31,565/- Rs.6,02,99,64/- 2006-07 Rs.NIL Rs.31,565/- 2007-08 Rs.27,58,400/- - 2008-09 Rs.10,19,61,651/- Rs.27

GUJARAT FLUROCHEMICALS LIMITED,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed, whereas appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 117/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jun 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr. No.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, and Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhas Bains, CIT-DR and Shri Vinod Tanwani, Sr.DR

section 88E for the securities transaction tax paid during the year. (Rs.in) Asstt.Year Amount added back to Amount added the total income back in the total income in previous Asstt.Year 2005-06 Rs.31,565/- Rs.6,02,99,64/- 2006-07 Rs.NIL Rs.31,565/- 2007-08 Rs.27,58,400/- - 2008-09 Rs.10,19,61,651/- Rs.27