Search: section 68

8 results for “section 68”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7 Section 80C7 Disallowance7 Addition to Income7 Deduction6 Section 80G4 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 684 Section 404 Section 144C

IMRAN YUNUSBHAI MALWAT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2025/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms Suchitra Kmble

For Appellant: Shri Soheb Luhari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Veerbadram Vislavath, Sr. DR

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 80CSection 80G

80C amounting to Rs. 2,219/-. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld.CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal of the assessee by observing as follows: “…I have carefully considered the submissions of the appellant, the facts of the case, the materials available on record. The appellant filed

IMRAN YUNUSBHAI MALWAT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

IMRAN YUNUSBHAI MALWAT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

ITO, WARD-3(3)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI ASHESH SIDHARTH AGARWAL,, AHMEDABAD

RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

M/S. RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

THE ITO, WARD-11(4),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SHAMSHENDER LOHIA, AHMEDABAD

SHALLU BANSAL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

SARITA R JADON,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DCIT, PANCHMAHAL CIRCLE, GODHRA

SARITA R JADON,PANCHMAHAL vs. THE DCIT, PANCHMAHAL CIRCLE, GODHRA