NARANBHAI SAMATBHAI BHARWAD THROUGH LEGAL HEIR DEVRAJBHAI NARANBHAI BHARWAD,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Dr.Brr Kumar & Shri Tr Senthil Kumar

68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D and reflected in the return

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA

section 68 to 69D of the Act. Thus the presumption provided under section 132 (4A) of the Act does

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA vs. NEOTECH EDUCATION FOUNDATION, VADODARA

section 68 to 69D of the Act. Thus the presumption provided under section 132 (4A) of the Act does

SHRI PRAVINCHANDRA R PATEL,VADODARA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA

section 68 to 69D of the Act. Thus the presumption provided under section 132 (4A) of the Act does

PARK PARADISE,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member\nAnd Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member\nITA Nos.207 & 208/Ahd/2022\nAssessment Year 2017-18\nPark Plaza\nNr. Saurabh Park,\nGotri-Samata, Road,\nGotri Vadodara\nGujarat-390021\nPAN: AAPFP6647K\nVs\nThe PCIT,\nVadodara-1,\nVadodara\nPark Paradise\nPlot No. 75,\nNr. Billa Bong School,\nVadsar, Vadodara\nGujarat-390010\nPAN: AASFP0787D\n(Appellant)\nVs\nThe PCIT,\nVadodara-1,\nVadodara\n(Respondent)\nAssessee Represented: Shri M.J. Shah, Adv. &\nS

68 section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D,\nif such income

PARK PLAZA,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member\nAnd Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member\n\nITA Nos.207 & 208/Ahd/2022\nAssessment Year 2017-18\n\n| Park Plaza\n| Nr. Saurabh Park,\n| Gotri-Samata, Road,\n| Gotri Vadodara\n| Gujarat-390021\n| PAN: AAPFP6647K\n| Park Paradise\n| Plot No. 75,\n| Nr. Billa Bong School,\n| Vadsar, Vadodara\n| Gujarat-390010\n| PAN: AASFP0787D\n| (Appellant)\n\n| The PCIT,\n| Vadodara-1,\nVs Vadodara\n\n| Vs The PCIT,\n| Vadodara-1,\n| Vadodara\n| (Respondent)\n\nA

68 section 69, section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D,\nif such income

ARROW CLOTHING PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(3), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Smt. Annapurna Gupta

Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C and 69D. The same was amended by the 2nd Amendment Act; w.e.f. 01.04.2017, enhancing

AADHYA INFRASTRUCTURE,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.132/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Aadhya Infrastructure The Pr.Cit बनाम/ C/202, Manorath Complex Vadodara -1 V/S. Nr.Jalaram Nagar B/H. Mothers School Gotri Road Vadodara – 390 021 (Gujarat) Pan: Aayfa 4505 C & आयकर अपील सं /Ita No.133/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Aadhya Reality The Pr.Cit बनाम/ 10, Gopal Nagar Vadodara-1 V/S. Gotri Vasna Road Vasna Vadodara – 390 007 (Gujarat) Pan: Aazfa 3693 G पीलाथ&/ (Appellants) '( यथ&/ (Respondent) Assessee(S) By : Ms. Urvashi Sodhan, Ar Revenue By : Shri Prithviraj Meena, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 17/10/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

Sections 68 to 69D of the Act. By failing to tax the undisclosed income under Section 69A and at the higher

AADHYA REALITY,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-1, VADODARA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.132/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Aadhya Infrastructure The Pr.Cit बनाम/ C/202, Manorath Complex Vadodara -1 V/S. Nr.Jalaram Nagar B/H. Mothers School Gotri Road Vadodara – 390 021 (Gujarat) Pan: Aayfa 4505 C & आयकर अपील सं /Ita No.133/Ahd/2022 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Aadhya Reality The Pr.Cit बनाम/ 10, Gopal Nagar Vadodara-1 V/S. Gotri Vasna Road Vasna Vadodara – 390 007 (Gujarat) Pan: Aazfa 3693 G पीलाथ&/ (Appellants) '( यथ&/ (Respondent) Assessee(S) By : Ms. Urvashi Sodhan, Ar Revenue By : Shri Prithviraj Meena, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09/10/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 17/10/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

Sections 68 to 69D of the Act. By failing to tax the undisclosed income under Section 69A and at the higher

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA, VADODARA vs. RADHIKA JEWELLERS, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 68 to 69D of the Act nor made any separate addition in this regard. 5.1. Once the particulars

SHRI SHAILESH S. PATEL,,PALANPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5,, PALANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3063/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13)

Section 68 to 69D). ITA No. 3063/Ahd/16 [Shailesh S. Patel vs.ITO] AY 2012-13 - 4 - 2. I have therefore

SHREE INFRASTRUCTURE,VADOADARA vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1563/Ahd/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2014-15 Shree Infrastructure, D.C.I.T., Sthapatya-2, Vs. Circle-1(2), Behind Keya Motors, Vadodara. Tp-13, Vadodara-390002. Pan: Acifs6977Q

section 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C and 69D of the Act. The learned CIT-A also held that all the case