BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

21 results for “section 68”+ Section 17Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka64Delhi28Ahmedabad21Lucknow11Jaipur10Mumbai10Cochin7Bangalore7Kolkata5Cuttack3Chennai2Rajkot1Allahabad1Chandigarh1Indore1Jabalpur1Nagpur1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 80I133Section 271(1)(c)38Section 36(1)(iii)19Deduction19Penalty19Disallowance19Set Off of Losses19Section 12A(1)(ac)6Section 80G(5)(iii)5

DAKSHIN GUJARAT SAMAST CHAUDHARI SAMAJ CHERITABLE TRUST FEDERATION,SURAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 742/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Jun 2025

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokar

For Respondent: Shri R.P. Rastogi, CIT
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iii)

68 years, has categorically affirmed that he is not familiar with the use of computers, nor does he operate the e-filing account of the trust. The applications filed under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and section 80G(5)(iii) were rejected by the CIT(Exemption) by orders dated 03.09.2024, which were hosted only on the portal. However

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2

Charitable Trust2
Exemption2
Condonation of Delay2
ITA 2201/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2202/AHD/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 118/AHD/2009[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 722/AHD/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL.CIT., RANGE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3254/AHD/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1966/AHD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2334/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 199/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 442/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2916/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1281/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2489/AHD/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2917/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT.,(OSD)CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1385/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 441/AHD/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3126/AHD/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2765/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2706/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1499/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page