BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai33Chennai19Jaipur16Bangalore11Delhi10Ahmedabad9Hyderabad9Visakhapatnam8Kolkata7Cochin6Jodhpur6Pune5Amritsar4Karnataka4Panaji2Chandigarh2Nagpur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 80P32Section 14719Section 80P(2)(d)16Section 14813Section 143(3)12Deduction9Reassessment8Disallowance8Addition to Income

THE KAMRAN VIKAS CO.OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,SABARKANTHA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 , HIMATNAGAR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1657/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Nov 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1657 To 1659/Ahd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2017-18) िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Shri Rushin Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhakar Verma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s 143(3) are bad in law. (2) The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts of the case in sustaining the disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (3) The appellant craves leave to add, amend, altar or delete the grounds

6
Section 148A5
Section 2635
Section 80P(4)4

THE KAMRAN VIKAS CO.OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. ,SABARKANTHA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HIMATNAGAR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1659/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1657 To 1659/Ahd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2017-18) िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Shri Rushin Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhakar Verma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s 143(3) are bad in law. (2) The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts of the case in sustaining the disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (3) The appellant craves leave to add, amend, altar or delete the grounds

THE KAMRAN VIKAR CO.OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,SABARKANTHA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HIMATNAGAR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1658/AHD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1657 To 1659/Ahd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2017-18) िनधा"रण वष"

For Appellant: Shri Rushin Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhakar Verma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s 143(3) are bad in law. (2) The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts of the case in sustaining the disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. (3) The appellant craves leave to add, amend, altar or delete the grounds

BALASINOR VIKAS CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,MAHISAGAR vs. THE PR. CIT, VADODARA-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 908/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 908/Ahd/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) बनाम/ Balasinor Vikas Co.Op. The Principal Credit Society Ltd. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Rajpuri Darwaja, Opp. Tax Masjit, Balasinor - Vadodara-1, Baroda - 388255, Gujarat 390007 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaaab4748H (Appellant) .. (Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant By : Shri Mehul K. Patel, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By Shri Sudhendu Das, Cit. Dr : Date Of Hearing 02/09/2024 01/10/2024 Date Of Pronouncement O R D E R Per Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Principle Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pcit, Vadodara-1 (In Short ‘The Pcit’), Dated 22.03.2024 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘The Act’) For The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Had Filed His Return Of Income For A.Y. 2017-18 On 18.10.2017 Declaring Nil Income. The Original Assessment Was Completed U/S.143(3) Of The

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed his return of income for A.Y. 2017-18 on 18.10.2017 declaring Nil income. The original assessment was completed u/s.143(3) of the ITA No. 908/Ahd/2024 [Balasinor Vikas Co.Op

SAVLI TALUKA SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY EMPLOYEES CO OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1772/AHD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.1772/Ahd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2019-20 Savli Taluka Secondary & The Income Tax Officer बनाम/ Higher Secondary Employees Ward-1(2)(2) V/S. Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd. Vadodara – 390 007 18, Rayakaka Park Savli Desar Road Vadodara – 391 770. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aafas 6647 D (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) ("" यथ"/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sanket Bakshi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Abhijit Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 12/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 04/11/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Siddhartha Nautiyal, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri Sanket Bakshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit Sr.DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 272(1)(d)Section 68

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Other Grounds Savli Taluka Secondary and Higher Secondary Employees Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. vs. ITO Asst. Year : 2019-20 9. The learned CIT(A) and the learned AO erred in fact and in law in charging interest u/s. 234A of the Act. 10. The learned CIT(A) and the learned AO erred

SHRI MODHESHWARI BACHAT DHIRAN ANE GRAHAK SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(PREVIOUSLY WARD-5), PALANPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1977/AHD/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad26 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

reassessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2012-13. I.T.A No. 1977/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2012-13 Page No 2 Shri Modheshwari Bachat Dhiran Ane Grahak Sakhakri Mandli Ltd. Vs. ITO 2. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that

SALOJ DUDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI MANDALI LIMITED,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)(4), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in above terms

ITA 1685/AHD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Apr 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Shri D. K. Parikh, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Prateek Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250(6)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

reassessment order passed u/s 147 R.W.S 144B of the IT Act which is without jurisdiction and also illegal and bad in law as there is no escapement of any income as per alleged information u/s 148 of the Act. It be so held now and order passed by lower authorities be quashed/cancelled. 2. Without prejudice to the above ground

THE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT CO.OP.CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,,SIDHPUR vs. THE ITO, PATAN WARD-4, , UNJHA

In the result, Ground No. 3 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose purposes

ITA 230/AHD/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Mar 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri H.V. Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(4)

D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JM: These are appeals have been filed by the Assessee against the orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide orders dated 24.05.2022 passed for the Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2017-18. Since largely common facts and issues

THE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT CO.OP.CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,,SIDHPUR vs. THE ITO, PATAN WARD-1, , UNJHA

In the result, Ground No. 3 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose purposes

ITA 231/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad21 Mar 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta& Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri H.V. Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 57Section 80PSection 80P(4)

D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JM: These are appeals have been filed by the Assessee against the orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), (in short “Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide orders dated 24.05.2022 passed for the Assessment Years 2012-13 & 2017-18. Since largely common facts and issues