Search: reassessment u/s 147 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore25 Cochin18 Mumbai12 Surat8 Jaipur5 Chennai5 Indore5 Jabalpur3 Ahmedabad2 Amritsar2 Hyderabad2 Kolkata1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 272A(1)(d)5 Section 142(1)5 Section 273B3 Section 1473 Section 1443 Section 271A(1)(d)2 Section 1322 Section 148A2 Penalty

JAYSHREE NILAM PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, INTL. TAXN., AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 942/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad11 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Thakkar, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Malarkodi R., Sr. DR

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 271A(1)(d)Section 272(1)(d)Section 272A(1)(d)

2

273B of the Act. 2. The appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that the present appeal is preferred by the assessee, Ms. Jayshree Nilam Patel, against the order of penalty levied under section 272A

MANISHKUMAR RAMLAKHAN AGRAWAL,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OOFICER, WARD 6(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 920/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajenkumar M Vasavda, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 271A(1)(d)Section 272A(1)(d)Section 273B

u/s. 271A(1)(d).” 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual serving as Executive Director in Gopinath Enterprise Private Limited. The assessee filed his return of income for the Assessment Year 2018–19 declaring a total income of ₹31,34,370/-, which included exemption from Long-Term Capital Manishkumar Ramlakhan Agrawal