HEMLATA VISHNUBHAI GUPTA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD--(3)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12

147 of the Act making addition of A.Y. 2011-12 Page 2 of 6 Rs.32,25,601/- as the escaped income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer also initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act and Section 271F of the Act for failure to furnish the return of income. 3. Aggrieved against the ex-parte assessment

VISHWAS COMODITY,PATAN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, PATAN

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2013-14

reassessment order dated 16.09.2021 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Condonation of delay 3 1,18,10,000/- as unexplained money under section 69A and taxed the same under section 115BBE. Penalty proceedings under sections 271(1)(c), 271F, and 271(1)(b) were also separately initiated

BHAVINIBEN SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-1(2)(1) (PREVIOUSLY WARD-1(2)(2)), VADODARA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

u/s. 271F of the Act. ITA Nos.548 & 549/Ahd/2023 Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2012-13 Page 3 of 7 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, edit, delete, modify or change all or any of the grounds of appeal at the time of or before the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Firstly we are taking up ITA No.548/Ahd/2023

BHAVINIBEN SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-1(2)(1) (PREVIOUSLY WARD-1(2)(2)), VADODARA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble

u/s. 271F of the Act. ITA Nos.548 & 549/Ahd/2023 Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2012-13 Page 3 of 7 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter, edit, delete, modify or change all or any of the grounds of appeal at the time of or before the hearing of the appeal.” 3. Firstly we are taking up ITA No.548/Ahd/2023

ARVIND SHASHANK HUF,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

reassessment order passed, requires to be\nquashed.\n10. That the assessee has filled his detailed reply on 21/12/2021,\n18/02/2022 and 25/03/2022, however without considering the\ndocumentary evidences on record, A.O. has passed an order u/s 148\nr.w.s.144 on presumption and assumption is against the provision of\nlaw and against the principle of natural justice and as such it requires

GOVINDBHAI BHAVANDAS PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO WARD 4(2)(2), AHMEDABAD (EXISTING ITO WARD 4(2)(1), AHMEDABAD), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby dismissed

Bench: Ld. Cit(A) Who Has Set Aside The Exparte Assessment Order Invoking Section 251(1)(A) Of The Act By Observing As Follows:

147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2011-12. I.T.A No. 256/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2011-12 Page No 2 Govindbhai Bhavandas Patel. vs. ITO 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an individual has not filed the Return of Income for the Asst. Year