BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi165Mumbai58Amritsar34Chennai34Jaipur28Bangalore26Kolkata17Calcutta14Nagpur14Hyderabad11Karnataka8Dehradun8Raipur7Lucknow7Indore6Telangana6Surat6Agra4Ahmedabad3Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh2Kerala2Uttarakhand1Jodhpur1Punjab & Haryana1SC1

Key Topics

Section 1445Section 69A5Section 1475Section 1483Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 692Section 133(6)2Section 142(1)

BRIJESHKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI PATEL,ANAND vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-1(3)(1), PETLAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 18/AHD/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench , Ahmedabad For Assessment Year 2011-12 Is Directed Against The Appellate Order Dated 7Th November, 2023 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income

For Appellant: Shri Vinit Mundra, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Trupti Patel, Sr. D.R
Section 139Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 69A

147 to frame reassessment in the case of the assessee, and this led to issuance of notice u/s 148. The I.T.A No. 18/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2011-12 Page No. 8 Brijeshkumar Jayantibhai Patel v. ITO assessee did not file return of income in response to notice issued by the AO u/s 148. There were other notices/letters issued

2
Unexplained Money2
Cash Deposit2

SARDARBHAI RAMSANGBHAI DHULIYA ,PALANPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 PREVIOUSLY WARD-5, PALANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 899/AHD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Aug 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad , Which Has Arisen From The Appellate Order Dated 22-05-2023 Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1053040290(1)

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divatia, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 253(3)Section 69A

147 of the Act, vide reassessment order dated 29.12.2018. 5. Aggrieved, the assessee filed first appeal with Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) issued as many as ten notices to the assessee during the course of appellate proceedings , as detailed in appellate order passed by ld. CIT(A) , but there was no compliance by the assessee

RAJASTHAN JAIN MITRA PARISHAD,AHMEDABAD vs. NFAC, DELHI, JURISDICTIONAL AO: THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 337/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Trupti Patel, Sr. D.R
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69

147 read with Section 144 of the 1961 Act. 4. Aggrieved , the assessee filed first appeal with CIT(A) raising as many as four grounds of appeal. The assessee stated in the grounds of appeal as well statement of facts that the assessee’s income during the impugned assessment year I.T.A No. 337/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2013-14 Page No. 4 Rajasthan