LAKHUBHAI NATHUBHAI SISODIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(3), AHMEDABAD, CURRENT ITO WARD 3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 716/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Aug 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal
For Appellant: Shri P D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prateek Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69
147 of the Act for the reason there was the detection of substantial cash deposits in savings bank accounts, amounting to Rs.
36,50,000/- (Rs. 19,50,000/- in Dena Bank and Rs. 17,00,000/- in Bank of India), and the fact that assessee had purchased immovable property during the relevant financial year. The assessee had not filed
