BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai58Delhi30Indore21Raipur21Jaipur14Chennai12Kolkata11Bangalore9Dehradun7Pune6Jodhpur6Ahmedabad5Allahabad5Cuttack3Cochin3Hyderabad3Visakhapatnam2Patna1Nagpur1Jabalpur1Surat1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 14712Section 14811Section 143(3)10Disallowance4Reopening of Assessment3Addition to Income3Section 145A2Section 1332Section 131

GOLD FINCH JEWELLERY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1074/AHD/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: 01/08/2022
Section 131Section 133Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

reassessment. It is also established principle of law that if a particular authority has been designated to record his/her satisfaction on any particular issue, then it is that authority alone who should apply his/her independent mind to record his/her satisfaction and further mandatory condition is that the satisfaction recorded should be ‘independent’ and not ‘borrowed’ or ‘dictated’ satisfaction

2
Section 143(2)2
Depreciation2
Survey u/s 133A2

GOLD FINCH JEWELLERY LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 273/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Appellant: Shri Aseem Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: 01/08/2022
Section 131Section 133Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148

reassessment. It is also established principle of law that if a particular authority has been designated to record his/her satisfaction on any particular issue, then it is that authority alone who should apply his/her independent mind to record his/her satisfaction and further mandatory condition is that the satisfaction recorded should be ‘independent’ and not ‘borrowed’ or ‘dictated’ satisfaction

THE DCITANAND CIRCLE,, ANAND vs. ELECON ENGINEERING CO.LTD.,, ANAND

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1656/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Ms. Madhumita Roysr.No.

Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 147Section 148

reassess such income, other than the income involving matters which are the subject matters of any appeal, reference or revision, which is chargeable to tax and has escaped assessment.] 4.5 There is no dispute that the issue of the disallowance of the expenses concerning FCCB was the subject matter of appeal before the learned CIT (A). In view

THE DCITANAND CIRCLE,, ANAND vs. ELECON ENGINEERING CO.LTD.,, ANAND

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1316/AHD/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Ms. Madhumita Roysr.No.

Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 147Section 148

reassess such income, other than the income involving matters which are the subject matters of any appeal, reference or revision, which is chargeable to tax and has escaped assessment.] 4.5 There is no dispute that the issue of the disallowance of the expenses concerning FCCB was the subject matter of appeal before the learned CIT (A). In view

SARVODAYA TRADING CO.,,SABARKANTHA vs. THE ITO, S.K. WARD-2,, HIMATNAGAR

In the result, the appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2723/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Dipak Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 234Section 40

147 of the Act has been challenged. It is relevant to mention that the Ld. DR has also not objected to the addl. Ground preferred by the assessee. Needless to mention that the said point of maintainability has not been challenged before the Ld. AO or before the Ld. CIT(A). Since it goes to the root of the matter