BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 171clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi357Mumbai261Bangalore121Raipur80Jaipur65Kolkata48Chandigarh38Chennai36Pune32Telangana24Nagpur21Allahabad20Lucknow16Guwahati16Indore15Rajkot12Hyderabad10Ahmedabad8Amritsar8Cochin7Surat4Dehradun3Karnataka3Agra2Cuttack2Orissa2Panaji2Patna2SC1Rajasthan1Uttarakhand1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 14812Section 14A12Section 80I9Section 1478Addition to Income7Section 115J6Reopening of Assessment6Reassessment5Section 148A

MANISHABEN DILIP VANKAR,BHARUCH vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 691/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 149(1)Section 149(1)(b)Section 151Section 68Section 69C

reassessment notice issued u/s 148A(d) and notice u/s. 148 is invalid as it is issued even beyond the extended time limit provided by Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions Act) (TOLA) 2021) i.e. 30 June 2021. Therefore, it is humbly submitted before Your Honour that the consequent re- assessment proceedings completed u/s 147

4
Section 142(1)4
Section 24
Disallowance4

INNOVATE DERIVATIVES PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 31/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)Section 250

section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2019-20. I.T.A No. 31/Ahd/2026 A.Y. 2019-20 2 Innovate Derivatives Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is a company engaged in the business of trading in shares and securities, mutual

RACHNA SANJAY SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. PCIT, AHMEDABAD -1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 626/AHD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri/St.R. Senthil Kumar & Narendra Prasad Sinhaasst.Year :2014-2015 Rachana Sanjay Shah The Pr.Cit-1 72, Tapovan Society Vs Ahmedabad. Nr. Manekbaug Hall Ambawadi Ahmedabad 380015. Pan : Amdps 6571 P

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divatia, AR and Shri Samir Vora, AFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 263

147 rws 144B passed on 21.03.2022 by AO accepting the LTCG on sale of shares of Looks Health Services Ltd. (short 'LHSL') Rs. 92,12,772/- as genuine and the appellant was entitled to exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 2.2 That the in the facts and circumstances

GAUTAMBHAI NANSINH CHAUHAN,ANAND vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), PETLAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 711/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R. Kamble & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Amit Pratap Singh, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 250Section 271ASection 69A

147 read with section 144B of the Act. 2. Facts of the Case 2.1 The assessee is an individual and a resident of village Khododhi, Khambhat Taluka, District Anand, Gujarat. For the relevant assessment 2 year 2019–20, the assessee did not file return of income under section 139(1). Based on information received through the Insight Portal indicating substantial

GUJARAT INDUSTRIES POWER CO. LTD.,,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT.,CIRCLE-1(1),, BARODA

In the result, the captioned appeals are :

ITA 535/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad13 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 147Section 14ASection 80I

147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). Disallowance u/s. 14A: 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the action of AO in making disallowance by invoking the provision of section 14A of the Act and also in directing the AO to recalculate the amount of disallowance as per Rule

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, VADODARA vs. M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIES POWER CO.LTD.,, VADODARA

In the result, the captioned appeals are :

ITA 1257/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad13 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 147Section 14ASection 80I

147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). Disallowance u/s. 14A: 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the action of AO in making disallowance by invoking the provision of section 14A of the Act and also in directing the AO to recalculate the amount of disallowance as per Rule

THE DY. CIT., CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, VADODARA vs. M/S. GUJARAT INDUSTRIES POWER CO. LTD.,, VADODARA

In the result, the captioned appeals are :

ITA 2463/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad13 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Memebr

For Respondent: Shri Mohd. Usman, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 147Section 14ASection 80I

147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). Disallowance u/s. 14A: 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the action of AO in making disallowance by invoking the provision of section 14A of the Act and also in directing the AO to recalculate the amount of disallowance as per Rule

BEES INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD1(1)(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1283/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a private limited company engaged in infrastructural developments. For the Asst. Year 2013-14 assessee filed its Return of Income on 29-09-2013 I.T.A No. 1283/Ahd/2024