SHRI MUKESH R.SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-6,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt. Suchitra Kambleasstt Year - 2001-02

reassessment was made under section 147 of the Act vide order dated 31.12.2007 which was further rectified by the AO vide order passed under section 154 of the Act dated 12.2.2008. Both these orders of the AO were upheld by the CIT(A), against which the ITA No.736/Ahd/2005 and 6 Others Shri Mukesh Rasiklal Shah and Another Vs. ACIT

SHRI MUKESH R.SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,CIRCLE-6,, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt. Suchitra Kambleasstt Year - 2001-02

reassessment was made under section 147 of the Act vide order dated 31.12.2007 which was further rectified by the AO vide order passed under section 154 of the Act dated 12.2.2008. Both these orders of the AO were upheld by the CIT(A), against which the ITA No.736/Ahd/2005 and 6 Others Shri Mukesh Rasiklal Shah and Another Vs. ACIT

SHRI MUKESH R.SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENT.WARD-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt. Suchitra Kambleasstt Year - 2001-02

reassessment was made under section 147 of the Act vide order dated 31.12.2007 which was further rectified by the AO vide order passed under section 154 of the Act dated 12.2.2008. Both these orders of the AO were upheld by the CIT(A), against which the ITA No.736/Ahd/2005 and 6 Others Shri Mukesh Rasiklal Shah and Another Vs. ACIT

SHRI MUKESH RASIKLAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENT.WARD-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Smt. Suchitra Kambleasstt Year - 2001-02

reassessment was made under section 147 of the Act vide order dated 31.12.2007 which was further rectified by the AO vide order passed under section 154 of the Act dated 12.2.2008. Both these orders of the AO were upheld by the CIT(A), against which the ITA No.736/Ahd/2005 and 6 Others Shri Mukesh Rasiklal Shah and Another Vs. ACIT

THE UNITED BUILDERS CORPORATION ,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

154 taxmann.com 44 (Delhi)\nArguments on behalf of the Department\nThe persons whose statements have been recorded by the\nDepartment during the proceedings have already accepted the part in\nthe plat Since they me moved in the process transaction, and were\nparties to it along with the Assessee and others, there arises no\nquestion as to why assessee would want

THE MODERN CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-2(1)(4), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

154 taxmann.com 44 (Delhi)\nArguments on behalf of the Department\nThe persons whose statements have been recorded by the\nDepartment during the proceedings have already accepted the part in\nthe plat Since they me moved in the process transaction, and were\nparties to it along with the Assessee and others, there arises no\nquestion as to why assessee would want

RAM KISHOR SONI,AHMEDABAD vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI PRESENT AO: THE ITO, WARD-4(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

reassessment and the addition under Section 69A.\nHowever, during the appellate proceedings, the assessee failed to comply\nwith the notices and did not file additional written submissions despite\nmultiple opportunities given. In the absence of any representation, CIT(A)\n\nITA Nos.1281&1282/Ahd/2024\nRam Kishor Soni vs. ITO\nAsst. Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15\n3\n\ndismissed the appeals

RAM KISHOR SONI,AHMEDABAD vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI PRESENT AO: THE ITO, WARD-4(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

reassessment and the addition under Section 69A.\nHowever, during the appellate proceedings, the assessee failed to comply\nwith the notices and did not file additional written submissions despite\nmultiple opportunities given. In the absence of any representation, CIT(A)\nITA Nos.1281&1282/Ahd/2024\nRam Kishor Soni vs. ITO\nAsst. Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15\n3\ndismissed the appeals ex-parte, confirming

SHAIVAL COMCON LLP,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-5(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

u/s 144 of the Act, and the entire investment amount of ₹4,50,00,000/- was treated as unexplained income under Section 69 of the Act and brought to tax under Section 115BBE of the Act. The total income of the assessee was computed at ₹4,50,00,000/-, as against “nil” income previously declared by the assessee

PARVINDAR INDAR SINGH,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

reassessment order passed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and rectification order passed under section 154 of the Act relating to the same Assessment Year 2013-14. I.T.A No. 1001 & 1002/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2013-14 Page No 2 Parvindar Indar Singh vs. ACIT 2. Brief facts of the case is that

PARVINDAR INDAR SINGH,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

reassessment order passed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and rectification order passed under section 154 of the Act relating to the same Assessment Year 2013-14. I.T.A No. 1001 & 1002/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2013-14 Page No 2 Parvindar Indar Singh vs. ACIT 2. Brief facts of the case is that

SANJAY JAYANTILAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: S/Shri Sanjay Garg & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2014-2015 Sanjay Jayantilal Shah Ito, Ward-2(1)(1) 202/A, Shivalik 10 Vs. Vejalpur Opp: Sbi Zonal Office Ahmedabad. Ambawadi, Ahmedabad 380 015 Pan : Aktps 8891 A (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee By Shri S.N. Divatia & Shri Samir Vora, Ars. : Shri Kalpesh Rupavatia, Sr.Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30/09/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 07/10/2025 आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश Per Makarand V.Mahadeokar, Am: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 29.11.2024 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, [Hereinafter Referred To As "Cit(A)"], For The Assessment Year 2014–15, Arising Out Of The Assessment Order Dated 31.03.2022 Passed U/S 147 Read With Section 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As "The Act") By The National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As "Assessing Officer Or Ao"].

147 read with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") by the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as "Assessing Officer or AO"]. 2. Facts of the Case : 2.1 Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee had filed his return of income

HASMUKHBHAI MOHANLAL SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Years:2017-18

147 or u/s 153A of the Act, the assessment so made shall be regarded as regular assessment for the purpose of this section. In the present case, the assessment was made for the first time u/s 153C of the Act. As per provision of section 153C of the Act, the AO after recording the satisfaction u/s 153C

THE KALUPUR COMMERCIAL CO.-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

154 proposing to withdraw the interest is void. The return for AY 2011-12 was selected for scrutiny, and an order under section 143(3) was passed on 5th March 2014, raising a demand of ₹1.67 crore. This demand was adjusted against a refund due for AY 2009-10. Subsequently, The Kalupur Commercial Co.op. Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT Asst.Year

SHRI ANILKUMAR M. JAIN,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinhaassessment Year: 2012-13

reassessment. The appellant submits that the notice under Section 148 is bad in law. 4.0 The order passed by the CIT(A)-5, Ahmedabad is bad in law and contrary to the facts. The CIT(A) has grossly failed to consider the facts and submissions and his decision is prejudicial and biased. 4.1 The appellant submits that

ARVINDKUMAR AMULKH TANNA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 (3), AHMEADABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

154 10,99,43,284 2,97,34,926 2,79,81,468 8,52,11,191 3,44,69,278 153A in Rs. Since the Ld.CIT(A) allowed the appeal in part, the Revenue is in appeal(s) before us, and the assessee filed two appeals and Cross Objections. Following are the grounds: 3. Grounds raised by the Revenue

MAUNANG FARMS PVT.LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(4),(NOW ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

reassessment order, it is seen that the AO had made addition u/s.50C of the Act amounting to Rs.3,43,830/- [Value as per Jantri rate of Rs. 13,09,830/- less value as declared by the appellant of Rs. 9,68.000/-] while passed order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 23.12.2019. 6.2 On perusal of the appellant

GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY,,AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT

In the result, the above ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act. 4. The learned CIT(E) erred in fact and in law in invoking revision power u/s 263 of the Act on an issue of allowability of exemption u/s 11 of the Act despite the fact that proceeding u/s 263 cannot be initiated on debatable issue. Gujarat Technological University vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year

URMIN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee bearing ITA

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

reassess under section 147 or pass an order enhancing the assessment or reducing a refund already made or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee under section 154, for any assessment year beginning on or before the 1st day of April, 2001." 10.1 As per sub-section (2) of Section 14A of the Act, if the Assessing Officer having regard