BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 142A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh33Jaipur16Delhi14Mumbai8Pune6Raipur6Nagpur6Surat5Ahmedabad5Hyderabad5Lucknow4Bangalore4Patna4Kolkata2Indore1Chennai1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 142A12Section 1479Section 14A5Reopening of Assessment5Addition to Income5Section 1484Section 143(3)3Reassessment2

THE ITO, WARD-1,, ANAND vs. M/S. DEVRAJ DEVELOPERS,, ANAND

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 1524/AHD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jun 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1524 To 1526/Ahd/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr.DR
Section 142ASection 147

142A of the Act, for the purposes of making an assessment or reassessment under this Act, where an estimate of the value of any investment referred to in section 69 or section 69B or the value of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article referred to in section 69A or section 69B is required to be made, the Assessing Officer

THE ITO, WARD-1,, ANAND vs. M/S. DEVRAJ DEVELOPERS,, ANAND

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 1526/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jun 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1524 To 1526/Ahd/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr.DR
Section 142ASection 147

142A of the Act, for the purposes of making an assessment or reassessment under this Act, where an estimate of the value of any investment referred to in section 69 or section 69B or the value of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article referred to in section 69A or section 69B is required to be made, the Assessing Officer

THE ITO, WARD-1,, ANAND vs. M/S. DEVRAJ DEVELOPERS,, ANAND

In the result, appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 1525/AHD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 1524 To 1526/Ahd/2018 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 To 2011-12)

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr.DR
Section 142ASection 147

142A of the Act, for the purposes of making an assessment or reassessment under this Act, where an estimate of the value of any investment referred to in section 69 or section 69B or the value of any bullion, jewellery or other valuable article referred to in section 69A or section 69B is required to be made, the Assessing Officer

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD vs. N K PROTEINS PVT. LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 339/AHD/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad12 Nov 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri T R Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Chokshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT-D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 40A(2)(b)Section 43(5)

147. Considering this decision, which is rendered by Hon'ble ITAT in current year itself disallowance under Section 14A does not survive. • Considering these facts Assessee claimed that once addition made by the AO is deleted by the Hon'ble ITAT, disallowance u/s.14A would not survive and AO has already not made other additions based upon reasons recorded. Hence reassessment

YASHODABEN MANEKLAL SONI,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, DAHOD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 359/AHD/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M. K. Patel, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Dev, Sr. D.R
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

1) of the Act. Subsequently, an inquiry was carried out by the ADIT, Investigation Wing, Baroda and on the basis of some information so gathered the case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act followed by series of notice u/s 148 of the Act upon the assessee. Notice u/s 143(2) was issued on 25/06/2012 and thereafter the reasons recorded