ARVINDKUMAR AMULKH TANNA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 (3), AHMEADABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

losses are set off with the profits earned from trading from other platforms. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have upheld the order of the A.O. 4. It is, therefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) be set aside and that

M/S. CVM JEWELS PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Mahavir Prasad

set off of losses of any earlier year. The dispute is only with regard to quantum of losses to be determined in the earlier years. The same can be decided in the proceedings of those years and appeal was dismissed.” 4. We have gone through the relevant record and impugned order. Ld. CIT(A) decided the matter without calling

JAI TRIPATI STEELS PVT LTD,AHMEDABAD vs. PCIT-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2015-16 Jai Tripati Steels P.Ltd. Vs. The Ld.Pr.Cit-1 402, Maurya Atria Ahmedabad. Opp: Kalgi Stats Bodakdev, Ahmedabad. Pan : Aabcj 5104 E (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ar Assessee By : Shri Prathvi Raj Meena, Cit-Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26/12/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 14/02/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

setting of the profits thereof by claiming bogus long term capital loss, despite specific information in the possession of the AO had rendered the assessment order erroneous. The contents of the notice under section 263 are reproduced hereunder: ITA No.933 /Ahd/2024 10. Therefore, as per the ld.Pr.CIT, the AO was in possession of the information of the assessee having accommodated

OVEZ ARIFBHAI LAKHANI,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Has Arisen From The Revisionary Order Dated 12.03.2024 Passed By Ld. Principal

loss to Revenue, and, therefore, the re-assessment order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Therefore, provisions of section 263 are applicable in this case. The ld. PCIT set aside the reassessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. MONARCH NETWORTH CAPITAL LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly\ndismissed as not pressed.\n17. In the combined result, all three appeals filed by the Revenue for\nA.Ys.2013–14, 2014–15 and 2015–16 are dismissed

setting off losses for AYs 2013-14 to 2015-16. Reassessment proceedings were initiated alleging fictitious losses and gains from

M/S. KOSA CONSTRUCTION,,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(3),, VADODARA

In the result, all the grounds appeal of the assessee are allowed

set off against brought forward business losses of Rs. I.T.A Nos. 919 to 921/Ahd/2016 A.Y. 2007-08 to 2009-10 Page No 4 M/s. Kosa Construction vs. ITO 70,78,123/. Thereafter, the assessing officer has finalized the reassessment

PARVINDAR INDAR SINGH,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

set off of business losses (Reassessment) Assessment year 2014-15-Assessment was sought to be reopened in case of assessee

PARVINDAR INDAR SINGH,VADODARA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

set off of business losses (Reassessment) Assessment year 2014-15-Assessment was sought to be reopened in case of assessee

GUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD.,BARODA vs. THE PR. CIT, VADODARA-1,, BARODA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.468/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09)

setting off of brought forward losses to the extent of Rs.2,85,24,39,945/-. The book profit u/s.115JB of the Act was determined at Rs.72,37,98,000/-. The Ld.Commissioner after perusal of the record formed an opinion that reassessment

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

SMT. MANJULABEN B. PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

SMT. MANJULABEN B. PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

SMT. MANJULABEN B. PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

loss is first computed, relating to transactions in alleged foreign bank accounts, during appellate proceedings, the same should be allowed to be set off against returned income of the same year and carry forward of the same to subsequent year(s) for being its set off as per sections 70, 71, 72, 74 of the Act.” 13 I.T.A No. 1894/Ahd/2019