BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80G(5)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai41Bangalore17Chennai12Delhi11Kolkata8Lucknow7Indore6Jaipur6Rajkot4Pune4Ahmedabad4Hyderabad3Cuttack2Chandigarh1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 80G8Section 12A(1)(ac)6Section 80G(5)(iii)6Exemption3Section 253(5)2Condonation of Delay2Deduction2Addition to Income2Revision u/s 2632

SHRI SHENALMA GAUSHALA TRUST,BANASKANTHA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 94/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jun 2025
For Respondent: \nThe Commissioner of Income
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

5)(iii)\nand cancellation of the provisional approval by the CIT(Exem), may kindly be\ndeleted.\n9. The learned Authorised Representative (AR) with the help of statement\nof facts submitted that the assessee trust is a duly constituted public\ncharitable trust, registered under the Gujarat Public Trust Act since the year\n2016. The primary objects of the trust are wholly

SHRI SHENALMA GAUSHALA TRUST,BANASKANTHA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 95/AHD/2025[NA]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ahmedabad
10 Jun 2025
For Respondent: \nThe Commissioner of Income
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

5)(iii)\nand cancellation of the provisional approval by the CIT(Exem), may kindly be\ndeleted.\n9.\nThe learned Authorised Representative (AR) with the help of statement\nof facts submitted that the assessee trust is a duly constituted public\ncharitable trust, registered under the Gujarat Public Trust Act since the year\n2016. The primary objects of the trust are wholly

SEQUEL LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1114/AHD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Section 135Section 147Section 234ASection 263Section 80G

Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is allowable to be deducted / exempted from the total taxable income of the Appellant and therefore, the Impugned Order dated 27th March 2024 passed by the Respondent is bad in law. 4. The Impugned Order dated 27 March 2024 passed by the Respondent is erroneous in noting that the Assessing Order

SHAH RAKESH BHIKHABHAI (HUF),AHMEDABAD vs. THE PCIT, AHMEDABAD-1, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 415/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri T.R Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Vivek Chavda, ARFor Respondent: Shri A P Singh, CIT. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 80G

reassess the assessee again and again upon the same issue in a time barred assessment which is already concluded by the assessing officer after applying his mind and conducting sufficient 150 enquiry. 2.6 Lastly, without prejudice to the above, and in the alternative, the assessee would like to submit that your honour has explained that Only three parties' information