NEETABEN PATEL,VADODARA vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are hereby allowed

reassessment order thereby the penalty levied u/s. 271D and 271E are bad in law and relied upon various case laws. Perusal of the penalty order makes it clear, the assessee was issued with a show cause notice dated 04-07-2019 as to why not impose penalty u/s. 271D and 271E for contravening the provisions of Section

NEETABEN PATEL,VADODARA vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are hereby allowed

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

reassessment order thereby the penalty levied u/s. 271D and 271E are bad in law and relied upon various case laws. Perusal of the penalty order makes it clear, the assessee was issued with a show cause notice dated 04-07-2019 as to why not impose penalty u/s. 271D and 271E for contravening the provisions of Section

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. KUNJ INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1809-1810/Ahd/2017 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2854/Ahd/2016 With C.O. 13/Ahd/2019 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2008-2009 D.C.I.T, M/S.Kunj Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 4Th Floor, Zodiac Plaza, Cirle-2(1)(2), Vs. Ahmedabad. St. Xaviers Corner, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380009. Pan: Aadck1900D

reassessment.” ITA nos1809-1810 &.2854/Ahd/2017 CO No.13/Ahd/2019 Asstt. Year 2008-09 10 11.4 The provision of section 292-BB of the Act nowhere talks about the issuance of notice. Thus, where the statutory notice has not been issued by the income tax authorities, then the question of acquiring the jurisdiction in the proceedings initiated under section

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. KUNJ INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1809-1810/Ahd/2017 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2854/Ahd/2016 With C.O. 13/Ahd/2019 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2008-2009 D.C.I.T, M/S.Kunj Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 4Th Floor, Zodiac Plaza, Cirle-2(1)(2), Vs. Ahmedabad. St. Xaviers Corner, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380009. Pan: Aadck1900D

reassessment.” ITA nos1809-1810 &.2854/Ahd/2017 CO No.13/Ahd/2019 Asstt. Year 2008-09 10 11.4 The provision of section 292-BB of the Act nowhere talks about the issuance of notice. Thus, where the statutory notice has not been issued by the income tax authorities, then the question of acquiring the jurisdiction in the proceedings initiated under section

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. KUNJ INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1809-1810/Ahd/2017 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2854/Ahd/2016 With C.O. 13/Ahd/2019 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2008-2009 D.C.I.T, M/S.Kunj Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 4Th Floor, Zodiac Plaza, Cirle-2(1)(2), Vs. Ahmedabad. St. Xaviers Corner, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380009. Pan: Aadck1900D

reassessment.” ITA nos1809-1810 &.2854/Ahd/2017 CO No.13/Ahd/2019 Asstt. Year 2008-09 10 11.4 The provision of section 292-BB of the Act nowhere talks about the issuance of notice. Thus, where the statutory notice has not been issued by the income tax authorities, then the question of acquiring the jurisdiction in the proceedings initiated under section