BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi212Chennai42Mumbai39Jaipur34Amritsar33Kolkata13Nagpur13Hyderabad10Dehradun8Raipur7Indore6Agra4Ahmedabad4Lucknow3Jodhpur3Surat3Pune2Bangalore2

Key Topics

Section 1445Section 69A5Section 1475Section 2634Addition to Income4Section 1483Section 143(3)3Section 1323Section 2502Unexplained Money

SHRI ATUL HIRALAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 200/AHD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 200/Ahd/2021 धििाधरणवरध/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 Atul Hiralal Shah, D.C.I.T, 8, Amrashirish Bungalows, Vs. Central Circle-1(2), Near Prahladnagar Garden, Ahmedabad. Prahladnagar, Ahmedabad-380015. Pan: Aljps4966M

For Appellant: Written SubmissionFor Respondent: Dr. Darsi Suman Ratnam, CIT. DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153BSection 263

260A(7) read with Order XLI Rule 22 of CPC as interpreted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S. Nazeer Ahmed (supra) we think that the ITAT should not have precluded the assessee from raising the issue in the appeals instituted by the Revenue, even without the necessity of filing any cross-objections. Accordingly, the additional substantial question

2
Cash Deposit2

BRIJESHKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI PATEL,ANAND vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-1(3)(1), PETLAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 18/AHD/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad15 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench , Ahmedabad For Assessment Year 2011-12 Is Directed Against The Appellate Order Dated 7Th November, 2023 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income

For Appellant: Shri Vinit Mundra, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Trupti Patel, Sr. D.R
Section 139Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 69A

reassessment in the case of the assessee, and this led to issuance of notice u/s 148. The I.T.A No. 18/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2011-12 Page No. 8 Brijeshkumar Jayantibhai Patel v. ITO assessee did not file return of income in response to notice issued by the AO u/s 148. There were other notices/letters issued by the AO, but only part compliance

RAJASTHAN JAIN MITRA PARISHAD,AHMEDABAD vs. NFAC, DELHI, JURISDICTIONAL AO: THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 337/AHD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Trupti Patel, Sr. D.R
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69

reassessment order , if that be so , then there was no need for the assessee to file the appeal with ld. CIT(A) and further to ITAT. As per section 250(6), the CIT(A) has to state the points for determination, decision thereof and reasoning thereof. But in the instant case, the CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal

SARDARBHAI RAMSANGBHAI DHULIYA ,PALANPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 PREVIOUSLY WARD-5, PALANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 899/AHD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad02 Aug 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad , Which Has Arisen From The Appellate Order Dated 22-05-2023 Vide Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1053040290(1)

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Divatia, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 147Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 253(3)Section 69A

reassessment proceedings were initiated by Revenue against the assessee u/s 147/148 on the grounds that there was cash deposits of Rs. 14,46,320/- by the assessee in its bank account, but the assessee has stated that there was no cash deposits of Rs. 14,46,320/- made by the assessee in its bank account, rather these are time deposits