BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi133Mumbai82Bangalore56Jaipur46Chandigarh26Chennai26Kolkata22Hyderabad21Patna18Nagpur16Cuttack12Raipur12Agra11Ahmedabad11Indore11Guwahati10Ranchi9Surat8Pune8Rajkot6Cochin6Amritsar4Lucknow2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A12Addition to Income10Disallowance8Survey u/s 133A7Section 133A6Section 1326Section 139(1)6Cash Deposit6Section 684

NATHUBHAI YUSUFJI KURESHI,BANASKANTHA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, MODASA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 95/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69ASection 69C

reassessment proceedings, the appellant did not furnish complete and verifiable details as called for by the Assessing Officer. The appellant could not substantiate the genuineness of the alleged business of purchase and sale of buffaloes with credible documentary evidence. 6.2 The Assessing Officer has rightly observed that the appellant failed to furnish complete particulars of buyers and sellers, such

Reassessment3
Section 1472
Section 148A2

ADITYA PROHOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1162/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha (Accountant Member)

Section 147

reassessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2017-18. I.T.A No. 1162/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2017-18 Page No 2 Aditya Prohouse Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO 2. The registry has noted that there is a delay of 234

GUJARAT MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,KHANJI BHAVAN vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, AAYAKAR BHAWAN(VEJALPUR), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 651/AHD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 80GSection 80I

234 (SC)] 3. Shreeji Prints (P) Ltd. v. PCIT [(2023) 154 taxmann.com 424 (Ahmedabad - Trib.)] 4. Principal CIT v. V-Con Integrated Solutions Pvt. Ltd. [(2025) 173 taxmann.com 774 (SC)] 7 5. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. NYA International [2025] 173 taxmann.com 103 (SC) 10. The learned Departmental Representative (DR) relied upon the order of the PCIT and submitted

VICTORY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(5), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 350/AHD/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2012-13 Victory Construction Company, Income Tax Officer, 7, Amrapali Apartments, Ward-1(3)(5), Nr. Usmanpura Railway Vs Ahmedabad Crossing, Usmanpura, Ahmedabad-380014 [Pan No.:Aahfv8333J] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Manish J. Shah, A.R. Respondent By : Ms. Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing: 12.06.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 25.06.2024

For Appellant: Shri Manish J. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Saumya Pandey Jain, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 234Section 68

Section 148 dated 26.03.2019. However, the assessee has A.Y. 2012-13 2 not responded to the above notice thereby the Assessing Officer issued three more notices and completed the reassessment by making an addition of Rs. 88,82,028/- being the alleged contract receipt shown by the assessee as not genuine. 3. Aggrieved against the order, assessee filed an appeal

HARSHA RAJESH JHAVERI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENT. CIR. 1(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesee is hereby allowed

ITA 439/AHD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Deepak R Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Atul Pandey, Sr.DR
Section 68

234 and contended that there was an identical issue in the group case of the assessee which was accepted by the revenue as genuine and no addition of whatsoever was made in the assessment framed under section 143(3) of the Act. Accordingly, the learned AR submitted that the revenue cannot take contradictory stand in the identical facts and circumstances

SAKETKUMAR RUGNATH TANNA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA

ITA 977/AHD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 153A

234 out of total addition of Rs. 9,00,544. This ground of appeal is partly allowed.” 16.1. Ld Counsel has no serious arguments on the disallowances made on account of salary at 10% and Diesel, Transport Commission, Khedut lodging, Travelling expenses at 20% in the absence of proper bills and vouchers. But on account of Kasar [Trade] discount

SAKETKUMAR RUGNATH TANNA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA

ITA 978/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 153A

234 out of total addition of Rs. 9,00,544. This ground of appeal is partly allowed.” 16.1. Ld Counsel has no serious arguments on the disallowances made on account of salary at 10% and Diesel, Transport Commission, Khedut lodging, Travelling expenses at 20% in the absence of proper bills and vouchers. But on account of Kasar [Trade] discount

THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD vs. SMT. RITABEN SAKETKUMAR TANNA, AHMEDABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA

ITA 920/AHD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 153A

234 out of total addition of Rs. 9,00,544. This ground of appeal is partly allowed.” 16.1. Ld Counsel has no serious arguments on the disallowances made on account of salary at 10% and Diesel, Transport Commission, Khedut lodging, Travelling expenses at 20% in the absence of proper bills and vouchers. But on account of Kasar [Trade] discount

THE ITO WARD-5(3)(1) (PREVIOUSLY THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2)), AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SAKETKUMAR RUGNATH TANNA LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SMT. INDUMATIBEN RUGNATH TANNA, AHMEDABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA

ITA 921/AHD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 153A

234 out of total addition of Rs. 9,00,544. This ground of appeal is partly allowed.” 16.1. Ld Counsel has no serious arguments on the disallowances made on account of salary at 10% and Diesel, Transport Commission, Khedut lodging, Travelling expenses at 20% in the absence of proper bills and vouchers. But on account of Kasar [Trade] discount

SMT. RITABEN SAKETKUMAR TANNA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA

ITA 975/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 153A

234 out of total addition of Rs. 9,00,544. This ground of appeal is partly allowed.” 16.1. Ld Counsel has no serious arguments on the disallowances made on account of salary at 10% and Diesel, Transport Commission, Khedut lodging, Travelling expenses at 20% in the absence of proper bills and vouchers. But on account of Kasar [Trade] discount

SAKETKUMAR RUGNATH TANNA LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SMT. INDUMATIBEN RUGNATH TANNA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result the assessee appeal in ITA

ITA 976/AHD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 153A

234 out of total addition of Rs. 9,00,544. This ground of appeal is partly allowed.” 16.1. Ld Counsel has no serious arguments on the disallowances made on account of salary at 10% and Diesel, Transport Commission, Khedut lodging, Travelling expenses at 20% in the absence of proper bills and vouchers. But on account of Kasar [Trade] discount