BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 217(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai71Delhi63Chennai62Jaipur46Bangalore43Raipur13Kolkata12Hyderabad10Pune8Cuttack7Jodhpur6Chandigarh6Patna5Cochin5Ahmedabad4Indore2Amritsar2Guwahati2Lucknow2Rajkot1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 14711Section 2634Section 143(3)3Section 1323Section 153A2Section 139(1)2Addition to Income2Survey u/s 133A2

SHALIGRAM INFRA PROJECTS LLP ( LTD. LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP),AHMEDABAD vs. THE JCIT (OSD), CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 233/AHD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: S/Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Makarand V.Mahadeokarit(Ss)A No.167/Ahd/2021 Asstt.Year : 2017-18 & Asst.Year : 2018-19 Shaligram Infra Projects Llp Vs. The Jcit (Osd) 4Th Floor, Office No.401-402 Central Cir.2(2) B/H. Dishman House Ahmedabad. Opp: Sankalp Grace Ii, Ambli Ahmedabad. Pan: Acpfs 7047 A It(Ss)A No.194,195 & 196/Ahd/2021 Asstt.Year : 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 & Asst.Year : 2018-19 The Jcit (Osd) Vs. Shaligram Infra Projects Llp Central Cir.2(2) 4Th Floor, Office No.401-402 Ahmedabad. B/H. Dishman House Opp: Sankalp Grace Ii, Ambli Ahmedabad.

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ]BEFORE S/SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(SS)A No.167/Ahd/2021 Asstt.Year : 2017-18 AND Asst.Year : 2018-19 Shaligram Infra Projects LLP Vs. The JCIT (OSD) 4th Floor, Office No.401-402 Central Cir.2(2) B/h. Dishman House Ahmedabad. Opp: Sankalp Grace II, Ambli Ahmedabad. PAN: ACPFS 7047 A IT(SS)A No.194

MR. ARPANBHAI VIRAMBHAI DESAI,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE PR. CIT, AHMEDABAD-3, AHMEDABAD

In the result, all four appeals filed by the assessee are\nallowed in above terms

ITA 759/AHD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Oct 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri D K Parikh, ARFor Respondent: \nShri Sher Singh, CIT.DR
Section 12Section 147Section 263

Section\n- 12, 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act-2018 on 19.01.2021 against\nVirambhai Lilabhai Desai, Deputy Mamlatdar Class-III, E-Dhara Centre, Kalol and six\nothers of the family of Virambhai Lilabhai Desai.\n7. The FIR registered by the ACB and brief summary has been shared with your kind perusal\nin our previous correspondence

THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD vs. SHALIGRAM INFRA PROJECTS LLP , AHMEDABAD

Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 291/AHD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Sept 2025AY 2018-19
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD\nBEFORE S/SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER\nAND\nMAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nIT(SS)A No.167/Ahd/2021\nAsstt.Year : 2017-18\nAND\nITA No.233/Ahd/2021\nAsst.Year: 2018-19\nShaligram Infra Projects LLP\n4th Floor, Office No.401-402\nB/h. Dishman House\nOpp: Sankalp Grace II, Ambli\nAhmedabad.\nPAN: ACPFS 7047 A\nVs.\nThe JCIT (OSD)\nCentral Cir.2(2)\nAhmedabad

DEEP ENERGY RESOURCES LTD. (FORMERLY DEEP INDUSTRIES LTD.),AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the matter is restored to the file of Ld

ITA 461/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad29 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri Sakar Sharma, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ketan Gajjar, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69C

217 ITR 597 (SC) and on the case of Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. vs. ITO 236 ITR 34 (SC) which have held that at the stage of initiation of proceedings under Section 147 of the Act, all that is required is formation of “reasons to believe” that the income has escaped assessment but not the established fact of escapement