BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

69 results for “reassessment”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi223Mumbai155Chennai134Bangalore88Jaipur81Ahmedabad69Kolkata29Rajkot28Raipur24Pune20Hyderabad19Jodhpur17Chandigarh15Amritsar15Patna12Visakhapatnam10Guwahati5Surat5Indore4Cuttack4Cochin3Nagpur3Lucknow3Allahabad2Panaji1Ranchi1Agra1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 13244Addition to Income24Section 26321Section 14719Section 1112Section 54F10Section 271(1)(c)10Double Taxation/DTAA10Section 1489

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. SMT. MANJULABEN BIPINCHANDRA PATEL, BARODA

ITA 41/AHD/2020[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2000-01

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. SMT. MANJULABEN BIPINCHANDRA PATEL, BARODA

ITA 43/AHD/2020[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2002-03

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

Showing 1–20 of 69 · Page 1 of 4

Section 69A9
Reassessment8
Unexplained Investment6

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 39/AHD/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 40/AHD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 38/AHD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. SMT. MANJULABEN BIPINCHANDRA PATEL, BARODA

ITA 42/AHD/2020[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2001-02

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

ITA 1894/AHD/2019[2000-01]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2000-01

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

ITA 1895/AHD/2019[2001-02]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2001-02

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

ITA 1896/AHD/2019[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2002-03

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

ITA 1897/AHD/2019[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2003-04

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE BIPINBHAI P.PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

ITA 1898/AHD/2019[2004-05]Status: HeardITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

SMT. MANJULABEN B. PATEL,BARODA vs. THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA

ITA 1915/AHD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEHAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 31/AHD/2020[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2000-01

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 32/AHD/2020[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2001-02

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 33/AHD/2020[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2002-03

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 34/AHD/2020[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 35/AHD/2020[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 36/AHD/2020[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2006-07

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. MANJULABEN B. PATEL LEGAL HEIR OF SHRI BIPINBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL, BARODA

ITA 37/AHD/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature

THE DY.CIT. CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BARODA vs. SMT. MANJULABEN BIPINCHANDRA PATEL, BARODA

ITA 44/AHD/2020[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Sept 2024AY 2004-05

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble, Judical Member & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha

Section 132

reassessment should be judged by the law as existing on the date of issue of notice and that if the notice and the assessment year is within the time period in compliance to the retrospective law, such notice can’t be questioned. The principle that the liability to the State is independent of any consideration of time and the legislature