YAKIN JAYANTILAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Makarand V.Mahadeokar

section 151. The assessee’s cases were subsequently selected for reassessment. However, despite issuance of multiple statutory notices under sections

YAKIN JAYANTILAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Makarand V.Mahadeokar

section 151. The assessee’s cases were subsequently selected for reassessment. However, despite issuance of multiple statutory notices under sections

YAKIN JAYANTILAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Makarand V.Mahadeokar

section 151. The assessee’s cases were subsequently selected for reassessment. However, despite issuance of multiple statutory notices under sections

YAKIN JAYANTILAL SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble & Makarand V.Mahadeokar

section 151. The assessee’s cases were subsequently selected for reassessment. However, despite issuance of multiple statutory notices under sections

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. AMBALIA HITESH CHHAGANLAL HUF, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble

reassessment proceedings was raised orally on the ground that the sanction obtained under section 151 of the Act prior to issuance

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. AMBALIA HITESH CHHAGANLAL HUF, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra R. Kamble

reassessment proceedings was raised orally on the ground that the sanction obtained under section 151 of the Act prior to issuance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. MONARCH NETWORTH CAPITAL LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly\ndismissed as not pressed.\n17. In the combined result, all three appeals filed by the Revenue for\nA.Ys.2013–14, 2014–15 and 2015–16 are dismissed

sections": [ "147", "144B", "69A", "148", "143(3)", "143(1)", "151" ], "issues": "Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were

SHREEJI DEVELOPERS,VADODARA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), SURAT AT VADODARA, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

reassessment order itself as invalid in\nlaw by observing as follows:\n\"5.3 The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Ashok Kumar Makhija (supra) and\nthe Mumbai ITAT in Arihant Engineers (supra) reinforced that the\nspecified authority under Section 151

SAI KRUPA DEVELOPERS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CEN. CIR.1(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, this ground of appeal 1 to 4 of the Department is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than the person referred to in section 153A

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. SAI KRUPA DEVELOPERS, AHMEDABAD

In the result, this ground of appeal 1 to 4 of the Department is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than the person referred to in section 153A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. SAI KRUPA DEVELOPERS, AHMEDABAD

In the result, this ground of appeal 1 to 4 of the Department is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than the person referred to in section 153A

SAI KRUPA DEVELOPERS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CEN. CIR.1(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, this ground of appeal 1 to 4 of the Department is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than the person referred to in section 153A

SAI KRUPA DEVELOPERS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CEN. CIR.1(2), AHMEDABAD

In the result, this ground of appeal 1 to 4 of the Department is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

151 and section 153, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that,— (a) any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing, seized or requisitioned, belongs to; or (b) any books of account or documents, seized or requisitioned, pertains or pertain to, or any information contained therein, relates to, a person other than the person referred to in section 153A

WAVES TRADELINE PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

Section 151. A notice issued without\ncomplying with the preconditions is invalid as it affects the jurisdiction of the assessing\nofficer. Therefore, the reassessment

THE UNITED BUILDERS CORPORATION ,,AHMEDABAD vs. DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

151 and section 153,\nwhere the Assessing Officer is satisfied that any money, bullion,\njewellery or other valuable article or thing or books of account or\ndocuments seized or requisitioned belongs or belong to a person other\nthan the person referred to in section 153A, then the books of account\nor documents or assets seized or requisitioned shall be handed

THE MODERN CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-2(1)(4), AHMEDABAD

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

151 and section 153,\nwhere the Assessing Officer is satisfied that any money, bullion,\njewellery or other valuable article or thing or books of account or\ndocuments seized or requisitioned belongs or belong to a person other\nthan the person referred to in section 153A, then the books of account\nor documents or assets seized or requisitioned shall be handed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD vs. MONARCH NETWORTH CAPITAL LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly\ndismissed as not pressed.\n17. In the combined result, all three appeals filed by the Revenue for\nA.Ys.2013–14, 2014–15 and 2015–16 are dismissed

reassessment proceedings on the grounds that reasons recorded\nwere factually incorrect and approval under section 151 was not furnished\ndespite

MANISHABEN DILIP VANKAR,BHARUCH vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 is invalid and deserves to be quashed in line with the retrospectively amended provisions of section 149 & 151