BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 12A(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi26Mumbai9Raipur6Jaipur4Ahmedabad4Bangalore3Lucknow2Chennai2Pune1Hyderabad1Cuttack1Kolkata1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 12A(1)(ac)6Section 80G(5)(iii)6Section 143(3)4Section 253(5)2Section 144C2Section 92D2Exemption2Condonation of Delay2Transfer Pricing2Disallowance

SHRI SHENALMA GAUSHALA TRUST,BANASKANTHA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 95/AHD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad10 Jun 2025
For Respondent: \nThe Commissioner of Income
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

1)(ac)(iii) and cancellation of the provisional approval by the CIT(Exem), may\nkindly be deleted.\nIn ITA No.94/AHD/2025\n1.1\nThe order U/s.80G(5)(iii) passed on 14.10.2024 by CIT(Exem), Ahmedabad\nrejecting the application for approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) and cancelling the\nprovisional approval by holding that in absence of details furnished by the\nappellant trust

SHRI SHENALMA GAUSHALA TRUST,BANASKANTHA vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals are allowed for statistical\npurposes

2
Addition to Income2
Comparables/TP2
ITA 94/AHD/2025[NA]Status: Disposed
ITAT Ahmedabad
10 Jun 2025
For Respondent: \nThe Commissioner of Income
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

1)(ac)(iii) and cancellation of the provisional approval by the CIT(Exem), may\nkindly be deleted.\nIn ITA No.94/AHD/2025\n1.1 The order U/s.80G(5)(iii) passed on 14.10.2024 by CIT(Exem), Ahmedabad\nrejecting the application for approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) and cancelling the\nprovisional approval by holding that in absence of details furnished by the\nappellant trust

RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.,DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in IT(TP) A No

ITA 781/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt & Shri Waseem Ahmed1. आयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A No. 1782/Del/2014 2. आयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A No. 781/Del/2015 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-11) Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. The Dcit बनाम/ 12Th Floor, Devika Tower Circle-21(1), New Vs. 6, Nehru Place, New Delhi Delhi/ 110 019 Addl.Cit Range-15 New Delhi "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacr0127N .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri S.N.Soparkar, Shri Vartik Chokshi, Ms.Urvashi Shodhan & Shri P.Shah, Ars ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Mahesh Shah, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri S.N.Soparkar, Shri Vartik ChokshiFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Shah, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92D

section 192 of the Act. But the assessee has claimed such expenses without deducting the TDS. Thus the impugned expenses cannot be allowed under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld. DR vehemently supported the order of the lower authorities. 17. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the material available on records

M/S. RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in IT(TP) A No

ITA 1782/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt & Shri Waseem Ahmed1. आयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A No. 1782/Del/2014 2. आयकर अपील सं./It(Tp)A No. 781/Del/2015 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-11) Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. The Dcit बनाम/ 12Th Floor, Devika Tower Circle-21(1), New Vs. 6, Nehru Place, New Delhi Delhi/ 110 019 Addl.Cit Range-15 New Delhi "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacr0127N .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri S.N.Soparkar, Shri Vartik Chokshi, Ms.Urvashi Shodhan & Shri P.Shah, Ars ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Mahesh Shah, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri S.N.Soparkar, Shri Vartik ChokshiFor Respondent: Shri Mahesh Shah, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92D

section 192 of the Act. But the assessee has claimed such expenses without deducting the TDS. Thus the impugned expenses cannot be allowed under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld. DR vehemently supported the order of the lower authorities. 17. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and perused the material available on records