Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80Lclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1483 Section 80H3 Section 143(3)2 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 80L2 Section 1472

SHRI VITHALBHAI R.PATEL,,NADIAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4,, NADIAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2462/AHD/2015[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Sept 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad&Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2462/Ahd/2015 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 1999-00) Shri Vithalbhai R. Patel Ito बनाम/ Ward-4, Dabhan Bhagol, Vs. Nadiad-387001 Nadiad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ado Pp1 428 N .. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri L. P. Jain, Sr. DRFor Respondent: 22/07/2019

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 80HSection 80L

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. 2. The solitary ground of appeal of the assessee is filed against the decision of the Ld. Cit(A) in confirming the penalty of Rs. 5,28,000/- imposed u/s. 271(1)(c) on different additions made by the AO. In this case the assessee