Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur40 Delhi37 Mumbai15 Visakhapatnam11 Amritsar10 Hyderabad5 Indore4 Ahmedabad4 Kolkata4 Lucknow4 Raipur3 Pune3 Nagpur2 Bangalore1 Allahabad1 Agra1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Section 80G4 Section 80C4 Deduction4 Section 543 Penalty3 Section 1322 Section 682 Section 572 Exemption

DEEPAK HIRACHAND BHIMANI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 492/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad01 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.492/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 Deepak Hirachand Bhimani, Income Tax Officer, 20, Shanti Sadan Estate, Ward 1(3)(1), Vs. Opp. Dinbhai Tower, Ahmedabad. Mirzapur, Ahmedabad. Pan: Aatpb6168K

Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 57

section 271(1)(c). A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law by itself will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars regarding the income of the assessee. Such claim made in the return cannot amount to the inaccurate particulars” 9.4 Thus, we are of the view that once the assessee has furnished all the particulars

DEEPAK HIRACHAND BHIMANI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(1),, AHMEDABAD

SHALLU BANSAL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

DEEPAK HIRACHAND BHIMANI,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(1),, AHMEDABAD

SHALLU BANSAL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

IMRAN YUNUSBHAI MALWAT,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

SH. RAJESH NARENDRABHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(2), VADODARA, VADODARA