BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi21Mumbai14Ahmedabad7Pune6Kolkata5Surat4Jaipur2Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Disallowance6Addition to Income6Section 250(6)3Reassessment3Section 14A2

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD vs. THE KALUPUR COMMERCIAL CO. OP. BANK LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue and all Tax Appeals are dismissed

ITA 1864/AHD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri N. R. Soni, CIT-D.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soparkar & Parin Shah, A.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)

u/s 5 r.w.s 145 of the I.T. Act and the case of the assessee is not covered by section 43D. In such, a situation, the concept 01 reality of income cannot be utilized for whittling down or nullifying the provision of section 5 of the I.T. Act. Under section 5, income has accrued to the assessee during the year

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD vs. THE KALUPUR COMMERCIAL CO.-OP. BANK LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are dismissed

ITA 1088/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roythe Kalupur Commercial Co. Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Op. Bank Ltd., Kalupur Bank Tax, Circle – 1(3), Bhavan, Nr. Income Tax Ahmedabad – 380 015. Circle, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380 009. & Asst. Commissioner Of Vs. The Kalupur Commercial Co. Income Tax, Circle – 1(3), Op. Bank Ltd., Kalupur Bank Ahmedabad – 380 015. Bhavan, Nr. Income Tax Circle, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380 009. [Pan No. Aaaat 9360 R]

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soni, CIT-D.R. &
Section 143(3)Section 14A

penalty proceedings under section 271 (l)(c) of the I. T. Act are being initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and concealment of particulars of income.” 8. The Learned CIT(A) in appeal, took into consideration this particular aspect of the matter that the RBI has conducted statutory inspection of the Co-operative Bank u/s

THE KALUPUR COMMERCIAL CO. OP. BANK LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(3),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and revenue are dismissed

ITA 770/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad14 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roythe Kalupur Commercial Co. Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Op. Bank Ltd., Kalupur Bank Tax, Circle – 1(3), Bhavan, Nr. Income Tax Ahmedabad – 380 015. Circle, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380 009. & Asst. Commissioner Of Vs. The Kalupur Commercial Co. Income Tax, Circle – 1(3), Op. Bank Ltd., Kalupur Bank Ahmedabad – 380 015. Bhavan, Nr. Income Tax Circle, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad – 380 009. [Pan No. Aaaat 9360 R]

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S. N. Soni, CIT-D.R. &
Section 143(3)Section 14A

penalty proceedings under section 271 (l)(c) of the I. T. Act are being initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and concealment of particulars of income.” 8. The Learned CIT(A) in appeal, took into consideration this particular aspect of the matter that the RBI has conducted statutory inspection of the Co-operative Bank u/s

TORRENT POWER LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT.,RANGE-8,, AHMEDABAD

In the result cross objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 776/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad08 Dec 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vinod Tanwani, CIT.D.R
Section 143(3)Section 254

43D which includes section 41(1) also. 12. Thus where Assessing Officer finds that claim has already been allowed in the earlier year then such benefit under section 80-IA should be given to the profits taxed under section 41(1). The argument of ld. AR is that once it has declared profits under section 41(1) it would mean

GUJARAT STATE LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2632/AHD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Feb 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Ms. Arti N. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd Usman, CIT/DR
Section 250(6)

43D pertains to banking/NBFC cases and is in respect to interest on bad/non performing assets which is not the case of the assesses. Therefore interest on loans given to farmers, to the extent understated by the assessee, is required to be added as income of the assessee. 4.3 Since the extent of understatement was not quantified in the audit report

GUJARAT STATE LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2630/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Feb 2022AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Ms. Arti N. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd Usman, CIT/DR
Section 250(6)

43D pertains to banking/NBFC cases and is in respect to interest on bad/non performing assets which is not the case of the assesses. Therefore interest on loans given to farmers, to the extent understated by the assessee, is required to be added as income of the assessee. 4.3 Since the extent of understatement was not quantified in the audit report

GUJARAT STATE LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE,, GANDHINAGAR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 2538/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Feb 2022AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Ms. Arti N. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd Usman, CIT/DR
Section 250(6)

43D pertains to banking/NBFC cases and is in respect to interest on bad/non performing assets which is not the case of the assesses. Therefore interest on loans given to farmers, to the extent understated by the assessee, is required to be added as income of the assessee. 4.3 Since the extent of understatement was not quantified in the audit report