THE ACIT, PANCHMAHAL CIRCLE,, GODHRA vs. MS. GRISHMABEN M. SOLANKI,, PANCHMAHAL
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2940/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Feb 2022AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Years : 2012-13 Assistant Commissioner Of Ms. Grishmaben M. Solanki, Income-Tax, Vs Rajmahal Road, Devgarh Baria, Panchmahal Circle, Panchmahal, Gujarat-389380 Godhra Pan : Cyops 3860 E अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri C.S. Sharma, Sr. Dr Assessee By : None सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 15/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/02/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice-: This Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-4, Vadodara (“Cit(A)” In Short) Dated 20.09.2017 Whereby He Cancelled The Penalty Of Rs.56,56,420/- Imposed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act” In Short).
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C.S. Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C
u/s 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.
ACIT Vs. Grishmaben M. Solanki
AY : 2012-13
5
5. At the time of hearing fixed in this case none has appeared on behalf of the respondent-assessee. Even the notice sent to the assessee at the address available on record has come back undelivered from the Postal Authority with the remark
