ASIAN GRANITO INDIA LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DY./JT.CIT., (OSD),CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

202, Dev Arc. Comm. Of Income Opp. Iskon Temple, Vs Tax, (OSD), Bodakdev, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad-380006 Ahmedabad PAN: AAFCA2340H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Shri Aseem L Thakkar, A.R. Revenue Represented : Ms. Neeju Gupta, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing : 24-07-2024 Date of pronouncement : 09-10-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- These two appeals

ASIAN GRANITO INDIA LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DY./JT.CIT., (OSD),CIRCLE-1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

202, Dev Arc. Comm. Of Income Opp. Iskon Temple, Vs Tax, (OSD), Bodakdev, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad-380006 Ahmedabad PAN: AAFCA2340H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Shri Aseem L Thakkar, A.R. Revenue Represented : Ms. Neeju Gupta, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing : 24-07-2024 Date of pronouncement : 09-10-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- These two appeals

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

202/-. Case was selected for framing scrutiny assessment, and notice under sections 143(2) and 142(1) were issued by the AO to the assessee. The assessee filed various details before the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. The background of the case is that in this case information was received from DDIT(Inv.) vide its letter no. DDIT

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. SHRI SANJAY KISHANLAL BISHNOI,, AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Ms. Suchitra Kamble

202/-. Case was selected for framing scrutiny assessment, and notice under sections 143(2) and 142(1) were issued by the AO to the assessee. The assessee filed various details before the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. The background of the case is that in this case information was received from DDIT(Inv.) vide its letter no. DDIT

VEENITA ENTERPRISE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

u/s 133 (6) of the Act to this party at the address furnished by the assessee calling for relevant details, however, the same was returned by the postal authorities. Therefore, the assessee was asked to produce the party or any authorized person on behalf of this party, which was also not complied with. As mentioned above, the AO gave

NAIMISHBHAI KANTIBHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr.Brr Kumar & Ms Suchitra Kamble

section 144B of the Income Tax Act was passed for the above referred assessment year on 26/03/2022. In the said order Rs. 64,46,202/- has been added to the assessee's income u/s 69C of the Act as unexplained expenditure. Simultaneously a penalty proceedings u/s 271