Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 200A(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai95 Delhi35 Karnataka25 Kolkata19 Bangalore16 Mumbai9 Visakhapatnam7 Amritsar3 Pune3 Jaipur2 Nagpur2 Raipur2 Ahmedabad1 SC1 Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 1392

LAKHUBHAI NATHUBHAI SISODIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(3), AHMEDABAD, CURRENT ITO WARD 3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 716/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri P D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prateek Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

section 271(1)(c) was levied on the amount of Rs. 8,75,000/- which was treated as unexplained investment, and the penalty was computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 5. In appeal, CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on account of delay in filing of appeal, with the following observations: “The facts