Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai24 Kolkata7 Visakhapatnam5 Pune3 Nagpur2 Raipur2 Hyderabad1 Bangalore1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 1392

LAKHUBHAI NATHUBHAI SISODIYA,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(3), AHMEDABAD, CURRENT ITO WARD 3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 716/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Brr Kumar & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri P D Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Prateek Sharma, Sr. DR

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

section 271(1)(c) was levied on the amount of Rs. 8,75,000/- which was treated as unexplained investment, and the penalty was computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 5. In appeal, CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on account of delay in filing of appeal, with the following observations: “The facts