Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi57 Mumbai37 Chennai13 Bangalore12 Indore11 Rajkot7 Kolkata4 Jaipur4 Ahmedabad3 Chandigarh2 Hyderabad1 Cochin1 Agra1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5 Section 365 Section 403 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 194H2 Penalty2

N K PROTEINS PVT. LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is directed to be deleted and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 463/AHD/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Jun 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ketan Gajjar, CIT-D.R

Section 194HSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 40

penalty imposed on the assessee u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has no legs to stand on and is liable to be deleted. 4. It would be useful to reproduce the relevant extracts of the ruling for ready reference. We observe that ITAT in assessee’s own case for assessment year 2011-12 vide order dated

N K PROTEINS PVT. LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

N K PROTEINS PVT. LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

ARVIND LIFESTYLE BRANDS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

RATHORE FREIGHT CARRIERS PVT. LTD.,,GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD