Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 194A(3)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore33 Mumbai25 Delhi16 Hyderabad8 Chandigarh7 Jaipur5 Jabalpur5 Chennai4 Ahmedabad3 Pune3 Kolkata2 Raipur2 Dehradun2 Cuttack1 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 80P(4)5 Section 80P(2)(a)3 Section 36(1)(iii)3 Disallowance3 Section 80P2 Section 402 Section 362

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ARVIND RETAIL LTD. ( SINCE MERGED WITH ARVIND LIFESTYLE BRANDS LTD.,), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3669/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri L.P. Jain, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Vartik R. Chokshi with Shri Biren Shah, ARs

Section 36(1)(xi)Section 40

iii. Interest Expenses of Rs. 2,32,890/- to Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited (for short KMPL) under section 194A of the Act . 8.2. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the gross expenses of Rs. 2,71,11,613/- (7,23,145+2,61,55,578+2,32,890) on account of non-deduction of TDS under the relevant provisions

M/S. BAJAJ FOODS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ARVIND RETAIL LTD. ( SINCE MERGED WITH ARVIND LIFESTYLE BRANDS LTD.,), AHMEDABAD

M/S. BAJAJ FOODS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. ARVIND RETAIL LTD. ( SINCE MERGED WITH ARVIND LIFESTYLE BRANDS LTD.,), AHMEDABAD

M/S. BAJAJ FOODS LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

THE MAHALAXMI CREDIT CO. OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,KHEDA vs. THE ITO, WARD- 3,, NADIAD