Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai27 Nagpur16 Hyderabad9 Chandigarh9 Delhi8 Jabalpur5 Jaipur5 Pune4 Panaji3 Visakhapatnam2 Kolkata2 Ahmedabad2 Amritsar1 Rajkot1 Surat1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 80I8 Section 271(1)(c)5 Section 404 Section 143(3)2 Section 194A2 Section 692 Penalty2 TDS2 Addition to Income2

M/S. DRAIPL-MSKEL(JV),,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1605/AHD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jul 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Sanjay Garg & Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2007-08 Draipl-Kskel (Jv) Ito, Ward-9(2) 2Nd Floor, “Msk” Vs. Ahmedabad. Passport Office To Panjarapole Rd. Ambawadi Ahmedabad 380 015. Pan : Aaaad 3825 B (Applicant) (Responent)

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhijit, Sr.DR

Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 271(1)(c)Section 40Section 80I

u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income in respect of both additions. After issuing show cause and considering the assessee’s replies dated 06.07.2010 and 29.02.2012, the AO levied minimum penalty of Rs.87,36,356/- being 100% of tax sought to be evaded. During the course of penalty proceedings on disallowance under section 80IA

M/S. DRAIPL-MSKEL(JV),,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

M/S. DRAIPL-MSKEL(JV),,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

MINAL PRASHANT VAKIL LEGAL HEIR OF LATE. PRASHANT RASIKLAL VAKIL,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1, INTERNATIONAL TAX AHMEDABAD , AHMEDABAD