Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Allahabad37 Delhi16 Chennai12 Bangalore9 Lucknow7 Ahmedabad3 Jaipur3 Mumbai3 Pune3 Kolkata2 Amritsar2 Rajkot2 Raipur1 Chandigarh1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 54B6 Section 54F5 Section 139(1)3 Section 144A3 Section 153A3 Section 1482 Section 1512 Section 1322 Addition to Income2

ABBASBHAI SAJAUDINBHAI BARAD,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1012/AHD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143Section 144ASection 147Section 148Section 151Section 68Section 69A

144A before framing the best judgment assessment. 7. Without prejudice the other grounds of appeal, Ld. CIT(A) erred in law by not appreciating the fact that Ld. PCIT-3, Ahmedabad has not followed the due process of law before granting approval to the reopening, as required by the provisions of section 151 of the Act for issue of notice

ABBASBHAI SAJAUDINBHAI BARAD,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

ABBASBHAI SAJAUDINBHAI BARAD,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), AHMEDABAD

TECHNODOT ENGINEERS PVT. LTD,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(2), AHMEDABAD

RAVINDRABHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(2)(5) NOW ITO, WARD-1(2)(2), VADODARA