Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 142Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Lucknow24 Chandigarh15 Chennai11 Delhi10 Pune6 Patna4 Ahmedabad4 Indore3 Mumbai3 Bangalore3 Jaipur2 Rajkot1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 142A14 Section 1473 Reopening of Assessment3 Addition to Income3 Section 50C2 Section 153(1)2

SMT. RASHIDABEN TAHER MORAWALA,GODHRA vs. THE DCIT, INT.-TAXA., BARODA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 1353/AHD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sudhedu Das, Sr.D.R

Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 153(1)Section 50C

penalty proceedings U/s 271(1) (c) of the Act is not justified 4.1. Ld. Counsel Mr. Bandish Soparkar appearing for the assessee submitted that the assessment order passed in the case is barred by time, because the reference made by the Assessing Officer under section 142A

SMT. RASHIDABEN TAHER MORAWALA,GODHRA vs. THE DCIT, INT.-TAXA., BARODA

THE ITO, WARD-1,, ANAND vs. M/S. DEVRAJ DEVELOPERS,, ANAND

SMT. RASHIDABEN TAHER MORAWALA,GODHRA vs. THE DCIT, INT.-TAXA., BARODA

THE ITO, WARD-1,, ANAND vs. M/S. DEVRAJ DEVELOPERS,, ANAND

THE ITO, WARD-1,, ANAND vs. M/S. DEVRAJ DEVELOPERS,, ANAND

THE ITO, WARD-1,, ANAND vs. M/S. DEVRAJ DEVELOPERS,, ANAND