SHRI BHAGWANBHAI R. MAKWANA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(2),, AHMEDABAD

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

undisclosed house property income and held that the assessee was having two house properties but the income from other house

LATE BHAGWATSINH JIBHUBHAI CHAVDA)L/H.BHAKTIBEN BHAGWATSINH CHAVDA,,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

Appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member), Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar (Accountant Member)

undisclosed house property income and held that the assessee was having two house properties but the income from other house

LYSA TRADING LLP,AHMEDABAD,GUJARAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(3), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2022-23 Lysa Trading Llp Ito, Ward-1(2)(3) Corporate House-2, Shilp Vs Ahmedabad. Corporate Park Rajpath Rangoli Road Bodakdev Ahmedabad 380 054. Pan : Aaifl 3030 D (Applicant) (Responent) : Assessee By Ms.Amrin Pathan, Ar Revenue By : Shri Yogesh Mishra, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08/05/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03/07/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

house property shown in ITR, as discussed in the foregoing paragraph, for the CAM charges claimed by the assessee of Rs.34,29,816/-, no evidence in the form of invoice raised by M/s.Sleek Electrical Pvt.Ltd. is found and therefore the assessee's claim cannot be accepted and therefore the shortfall in rental income shown of Rs.17,08,908/- is added

SHRI MAHESHBHAI S PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is party allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

undisclosed sources of income of the partnership firm. 10. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee in the present case is an individual and deriving his income from house property

SMT. BHAVNABEN MAHESHBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is party allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

undisclosed sources of income of the partnership firm. 10. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee in the present case is an individual and deriving his income from house property

SHRI ATIT MAHESHWARI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is party allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

undisclosed sources of income of the partnership firm. 10. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee in the present case is an individual and deriving his income from house property

SHRI LAXMANBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is party allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

undisclosed sources of income of the partnership firm. 10. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee in the present case is an individual and deriving his income from house property

SHRI SHANTILAL PRABHUDAS PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is party allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

undisclosed sources of income of the partnership firm. 10. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee in the present case is an individual and deriving his income from house property

SMT. BHAVNABEN MAHESHBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY. CIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is party allowed for the statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

undisclosed sources of income of the partnership firm. 10. Briefly stated facts are that the assessee in the present case is an individual and deriving his income from house property

NARESH GOPALDAS BHOJWANI,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(2)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose as per our above observations

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

undisclosed income from house-property. The undisclosed business income is in relation to the business of trading in shares and commodities

NARESH GOPALDAS BHOJWANI,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(2)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose as per our above observations

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

undisclosed income from house-property. The undisclosed business income is in relation to the business of trading in shares and commodities

PROF. ASHA KAUL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-14,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal is allowed

Bench: The Learned Cit(A) But Without Any Success. Assessee Is Not Satisfied & Is In Further Appeal Before Me.

undisclosed income from house property, it is pertinent to note that assessee on her own offered income from house property

M/S. GARRISON POLYSACKS P.LTD.,,BARODA vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BARODA

In the result, all the seven appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

undisclosed income for the current year." This statement was further corroborated by the statement of his son, who was working as a manager on salary. Admittedly, this surrender has not been retracted by the assessee, much less by successfully making out sufficient ground for discrepancy. Then, it has also been found by the learned Tribunal that the assessee had accepted

SHRI ALKESH LAXMANBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos.1678, 1679, 1680 & 1681/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years:2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Shri Alkesh Laxmanbhai Patel, Dcit, बनाम / 7, Maruti Hills Bungalows, Central Circle 1(2), Vs. Satellite, Ahmedabad – 380 015 Ahmedabad. "थायी लेखा सं/.जीआइआर सं/.Pan/Gir No. : Akrpp 0657 P .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

house property income. He furnished copy of statement of Axis Bank showing payment of installments. He claimed deduction u/s.24(b) of the Act in paper book filed before us. Same are reflected at Page No.45 to 50. In view of the above explanation given by the appellant, we are satisfied with the contention of the appellant, hence, we allow this

SHRI ALKESH LAXMANBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos.1678, 1679, 1680 & 1681/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years:2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Shri Alkesh Laxmanbhai Patel, Dcit, बनाम / 7, Maruti Hills Bungalows, Central Circle 1(2), Vs. Satellite, Ahmedabad – 380 015 Ahmedabad. "थायी लेखा सं/.जीआइआर सं/.Pan/Gir No. : Akrpp 0657 P .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

house property income. He furnished copy of statement of Axis Bank showing payment of installments. He claimed deduction u/s.24(b) of the Act in paper book filed before us. Same are reflected at Page No.45 to 50. In view of the above explanation given by the appellant, we are satisfied with the contention of the appellant, hence, we allow this

SHRI ALKESH LAXMANBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos.1678, 1679, 1680 & 1681/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years:2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Shri Alkesh Laxmanbhai Patel, Dcit, बनाम / 7, Maruti Hills Bungalows, Central Circle 1(2), Vs. Satellite, Ahmedabad – 380 015 Ahmedabad. "थायी लेखा सं/.जीआइआर सं/.Pan/Gir No. : Akrpp 0657 P .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

house property income. He furnished copy of statement of Axis Bank showing payment of installments. He claimed deduction u/s.24(b) of the Act in paper book filed before us. Same are reflected at Page No.45 to 50. In view of the above explanation given by the appellant, we are satisfied with the contention of the appellant, hence, we allow this

SHRI ALKESH LAXMANBHAI PATEL,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Mahavir Prasadआयकर अपील सं/.I.T.A. Nos.1678, 1679, 1680 & 1681/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years:2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Shri Alkesh Laxmanbhai Patel, Dcit, बनाम / 7, Maruti Hills Bungalows, Central Circle 1(2), Vs. Satellite, Ahmedabad – 380 015 Ahmedabad. "थायी लेखा सं/.जीआइआर सं/.Pan/Gir No. : Akrpp 0657 P .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)

house property income. He furnished copy of statement of Axis Bank showing payment of installments. He claimed deduction u/s.24(b) of the Act in paper book filed before us. Same are reflected at Page No.45 to 50. In view of the above explanation given by the appellant, we are satisfied with the contention of the appellant, hence, we allow this

SHRI ASHOK SUNDERDAS VASWANI,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Waseem Ahmed

House of Vasibhai Vasrambhai Desai, at village Khadeda, Rabari Vas, Dist. Patan. Sanjeet Motors 6, Saarthi Bungalows Finance P.Ltd. Prernatirth Derasar Road Satellite, Ahmedabad. 17/B/1, Devendra Society Naranpura Ahmedabad. B/6, Pallavi Apartment Opp: Municipal Market C.G.Road Ahmedabad. 3. In order to give logical end to the search, the ld.AO had issued notice under section 153A, 153C