SMT. LIZ HEMANGBHAI BHATT,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(2),, AHMEDABAD
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for non- prosecution
ITA 2426/AHD/2016[2008-0]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Jan 2025
Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.2426/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2008-09 Smt.Liz Hemangbhai Bhatt The I.T.O. Ward 14 (2) बनाम/ 301, A Devprit Apartment Ahmedabad V/S. Nr.Bodakdev Cross Road Ahmedabad "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Adtpb 9174 C (अपीलाथ$/ Appellant) (%& यथ$/ Respondent) Assessee By : -None- Revenue By : Shri A.P. Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 28/01/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/01/2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am: The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ahmedabad [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”] Dated 09.08.2016, For The Assessment Year 2008-09, Arising Out Of The Reassessment Order Passed By The Assessing Officer, Ward- 14(2), Ahmedabad (Hereinafter Referred To As “Ao”), Under Section 147 R.W.S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”).
For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR
Section 147Section 68Section 69
65,03,000/- made u/s 68 of the Act in respect of cash deposits in Bank Account.
3. That on facts, and in law, the learned CIT (A) has grievously erred in confirming
1/6th addition of Rs.19,52 408/- out of Rs.1,17,14,443/- made u/s 69 of the Act in respect cheque deposits in Bank Account, even though
