Search: house property

4 results for “house property”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi28 Mumbai16 Chennai6 Pune5 Karnataka5 Ahmedabad4 Hyderabad2 Bangalore2 Cuttack2 Rajkot1 Cochin1 Jaipur1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 144C(2)3 Section 143(3)3 Section 292B2 House Property2 Transfer Pricing2

JAVITH ANVER BASHA,BANGALORE vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-INTL. TAXN., VADODARA

In the result, the matter is restored to the file of DRP for carrying out the above directions

ITA 1406/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: Shri B. Chhataraj, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Prithviraj Meena, CIT DR

Section 144C(2)Section 147

35A duly filled, through email on 09-04-2024 which was within the time limit allowed under the law. 3. The Ld. DRP 2 failed to notice that the objections sent by him through email was followed by sending hard copied through courier which was delivered two days late because of the holidays in between due to Eid-Ul-Fitar

PRABODH MOHANLAL SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INTL. TAXATION, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed for statistical purpose

JAVITH ANVER BASHA,BANGALORE vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-INTL. TAXN., VADODARA

PRABODH MOHANLAL SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INTL. TAXATION, VADODARA

JAVITH ANVER BASHA,BANGALORE vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-INTL. TAXN., VADODARA

PRABODH MOHANLAL SHAH,VADODARA vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INTL. TAXATION, VADODARA

CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD