BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi10Jaipur9Mumbai7Ahmedabad3Bangalore3Chennai1Chandigarh1Lucknow1Amritsar1Nagpur1SC1Surat1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 543House Property3Section 1482Section 143(3)2Penalty2Limitation/Time-bar2Capital Gains2Exemption2Deduction2

SH. RAJESH NARENDRABHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(2), VADODARA, VADODARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1592/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad09 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2012-13 Shri Rajesh Narendrabhai Patel Ito, Ward-1(2)(2) Baroda Bolt & Engineering Works Vadodara. Opp: Lalbaug Atitigruh Pratapnagar Vadodara Pan : Acqpp 6089 C (Applicant) (Responent) Assessee By : None : Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 09/10/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

For Appellant: None
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 50C(2)Section 54Section 80C

House Property 15,54,000/- Long Term Capital Gain 62,60,142/- Income from Other Sources 91,168/- Gross Total Income 79,05,310/- Less: Deduction u/s 80C 30,000/- Total Income Assessed 78,75,310/- 2.8 Penalty proceedings under sections 271F

MOHAN RAMCHANDANI,BANGLORE vs. ACIT-INTL TAX-2 AHEMDABAD, AHMEDABAD GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1944/AHD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V.Mahadeokarasstt.Year : 2016-17 Mohan Ramchandani Acit-Intl Tax-2 Flat-11001 Boddaballapur Road Vs. Ahmedabad. Presting Monte Carlo Yelahanka Satelite Town So Bangalore North. Pan : Adgpr 0211 D (Applicant) (Responent) : Shri Saurabh Gupta, Ar Assessee By : Shri Saresh Kartik Laxmanbhai, Sr.Dr Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16/07/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 17/07/2025 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश

For Appellant: Shri Saresh Kartik Laxmanbhai, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 54ESection 54FSection 54F(4)

house before the due date for filing return under section 139(1) i.e., 31.07.2016, nor had he deposited the unutilized amount in the Capital Gains Account Scheme as required under section 54F(4) of the Act. Relying upon various judicial precedents the AO concluded that the agreement was self-serving and not capable of evidencing a genuine investment in residential

BHIKHABHAI H PATEL,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, PATAN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 886/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

For Appellant: Shri Parin Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Uday Kishanrao Kakne, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(c)

house property. 12. Ld. NFAC erred in law and on facts in confirming disallowance of Rs. 38,774/- under chapter VIA of the Act. 13. Ld. NFAC erred in confirming action of AO to treat agriculture income of Rs. 4,62,830/- as income from other sources. 14. Charging of interest u/s 234A, 234B, 234C are unjustified. 15. Initiation