BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “house property”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur29Bangalore24Mumbai22Karnataka21Delhi14Hyderabad13Chennai11Agra10Ahmedabad8Surat5Pune4Chandigarh3Kolkata3Cochin2Amritsar2Cuttack2Varanasi1Dehradun1Indore1Jabalpur1Nagpur1Rajkot1SC1

Key Topics

Section 271D14Section 27I12Section 269S8Penalty8Section 2717Addition to Income7Section 1446Section 576Section 686Section 22

SHRI JAYDEEPSINH VAJESINH DODIYA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT. C.I.T., RANGE-7(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, Ground number 2 of the assessee’s appeal is party allowed

ITA 2429/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 May 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Parimalsinh B. ParmarFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Shukla, Sr. D.R
Section 269Section 269SSection 271Section 271DSection 275(1)(a)Section 275(1)(c)

house on it, since repayment of said amount was not mandatory and there was no element of interest, and pooling of family funds was done by assessee due to family requirement and as she did not have any known sources of funds, no penalty could be levied under section 271D for violation of section 269SS. In view of the decision

6
Exemption6
Deduction6

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1029/AHD/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2003-04
For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 22Section 234BSection 271Section 271DSection 27ISection 57Section 68

house property. 5. The assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A) against the above order. With respect to claim of the assessee that the interest income amounting to Rs. 6,98,780/- qualifies as business income, the assessee submitted that assessee was in the business of providing need based finance and acting as agent which has given rise

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2771/AHD/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2003-04
For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 22Section 234BSection 271Section 271DSection 27ISection 57Section 68

house property. 5. The assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A) against the above order. With respect to claim of the assessee that the interest income amounting to Rs. 6,98,780/- qualifies as business income, the assessee submitted that assessee was in the business of providing need based finance and acting as agent which has given rise

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2772/AHD/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2003-04
For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 22Section 234BSection 271Section 271DSection 27ISection 57Section 68

house property. 5. The assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A) against the above order. With respect to claim of the assessee that the interest income amounting to Rs. 6,98,780/- qualifies as business income, the assessee submitted that assessee was in the business of providing need based finance and acting as agent which has given rise

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1030/AHD/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2003-04
For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 22Section 234BSection 271Section 271DSection 27ISection 57Section 68

house property. 5. The assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A) against the above order. With respect to claim of the assessee that the interest income amounting to Rs. 6,98,780/- qualifies as business income, the assessee submitted that assessee was in the business of providing need based finance and acting as agent which has given rise

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1031/AHD/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2004-05
For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 22Section 234BSection 271Section 271DSection 27ISection 57Section 68

house property. 5. The assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A) against the above order. With respect to claim of the assessee that the interest income amounting to Rs. 6,98,780/- qualifies as business income, the assessee submitted that assessee was in the business of providing need based finance and acting as agent which has given rise

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1032/AHD/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Mar 2022AY 2004-05
For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr. A.R. &For Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr. D.R
Section 144Section 22Section 234BSection 271Section 271DSection 27ISection 57Section 68

house property. 5. The assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT(A) against the above order. With respect to claim of the assessee that the interest income amounting to Rs. 6,98,780/- qualifies as business income, the assessee submitted that assessee was in the business of providing need based finance and acting as agent which has given rise

M/S. MADHUVAN CORPORATION,VADODARA vs. THE ADDL. CIT, CENTRAL RANGE, VADODARA

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1072/AHD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Ms. Urvashi Shodhan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N. J. Vyas, Sr. D.R
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 269SSection 271D

property, whether or not the transfer takes place or not will be hit by section 269SS only after 01.06.2015. In case of the assessee the amount of cash received from the members starting from 01.06.2015 comes to Rs 16,00,000/-. 7. In view of the above, it is clear that the assessee has received unaccounted receipt amounting