Search: house property

7 results for “house property”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai48 Karnataka21 Mumbai16 Jaipur15 Ahmedabad7 Hyderabad5 Delhi4 Kolkata4 Surat4 Bangalore1 Nagpur1 Pune1 Raipur1 SC1 Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 27I12 Section 1447 Penalty7 Section 271D6 Section 576 Section 686 Section 226 Section 234B6 Section 2716 Exemption

NARESH GOPALDAS BHOJWANI,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(2)(3), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 598/AHD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad31 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: The Final Hearing Of The Appeal.”

For Appellant: Shri Pritesh L. Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. D.R

Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

section 271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confirmed.” 5. The assessee is in appeal before us against the aforesaid order of Ld. CIT(Appeals). The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is earning income from Salary, House Property

NARESH GOPALDAS BHOJWANI,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(2)(3), AHMEDABAD

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

NARESH GOPALDAS BHOJWANI,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(2)(3), AHMEDABAD

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-9(2),, AHMEDABAD

SHRI PAVAN M.SHARMA L/H OF LATE MAHESH L.SHARMA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD