Search: house property

7 results for “house property”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai170 Delhi134 Jaipur42 Hyderabad39 Bangalore38 Chennai34 Kolkata17 Pune14 Chandigarh13 Raipur10 SC8 Ahmedabad7 Lucknow6 Indore5 Allahabad3 Jodhpur2 Cochin2 Nagpur2 Patna1 Rajkot1 Amritsar1 Surat1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 8024 Section 143(2)6 Section 143(3)5 Section 80J5 Deduction5 Section 36(1)(vii)2 Section 36(1)(viia)2 Section 682 Section 1472

M/S.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-1 , AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 177/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 80J

264 whose salary is 25,000/-pm Step 3: No. of employees having an effect of 7,099 increase [Opening-Closing) Step 4: Total emolument paid to 7,099 1,09,17,53,327 employees Step 5: 30% of total emouluments 7,099 32,75,25,998 paid to employees In view of the above discussion the claim of deduction

M/S.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-1 , AHMEDABAD

M/S.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR. CIT-1 , AHMEDABAD

BGSCTPL- MSKEL CONSORTIUM,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(1),, AHMEDABAD

JMC-MSKE(JV),,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(3),, AHMEDABAD

JMC-MSKE(JV),,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(3),, AHMEDABAD

BGSCTPL- MSKEL (JV),AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1),, AHMEDABAD

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3, GANDHINAGAR vs. SHRI RAMESH GOBARJI THAKOR, AHMEDABAD

THE DY.DIT, (INTL. TAXN.)- 1,, AHMEDABAD vs. VODAFONE WEST LTD., AHMEDABAD