SHRI PARAG PRAKASH DOSHI,,MUMBAI vs. THE PR. CIT-2, AHMEDABAD
In the result, the ground raised by the assessee is allowed
ITA 395/AHD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Dec 2022AY 2015-16
Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2015-16 Parag Prakash Doshi Pcit-2, 203-A, Shripal Nagar Co-Op. Ahmedabad Hsg. Soc., Nepean Sea Road, Vs Mumbai-400006 [Pan No. : Ahnpd2646P] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Kamlesh Bhatt, C.A. Respondent By : Shri Samir Tekriwal, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing: 10.10.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30.12.2022
For Appellant: Shri Kamlesh Bhatt, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Samir Tekriwal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 263
2(22)(e) was been deleted by the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in ITA No. 382/Ahd/2017. On identical set of facts for the present Assessment Year 2015-16 the Ld. PCIT invoked Section 263 to bring to tax, which is against the provisions of law. Therefore, pleaded to quash the revision proceedings.
6. Per contra, the Ld. D.R. appearing