BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “house property”+ Section 17Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka63Ahmedabad25Delhi12Lucknow11Mumbai10Jaipur4Cuttack3Bangalore3Pune3Indore2Chennai1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 80I168Section 271(1)(c)38Deduction24Disallowance24Section 36(1)(iii)19Penalty19Set Off of Losses19Section 143(2)10Section 143(1)(a)

ROTARY CLUB SOCIAL SECURITIES FUND BHAVNAGAR,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE DIT(EXEMPTION),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, order of the ld

ITA 649/AHD/2014[-]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Feb 2020

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarjit Singh)

For Appellant: Shri Mehul K. Patel, ARFor Respondent: Shri O P Sharma, CIT/ D.R
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)

properties of Rana caste or community of Ahmedabad, doing acts to improve education of community to give medical help etc. - Tribunal found that beneficiaries of assessee were members of Rana community meaning thereby natives of Ahmedabad only and other members of community accepted by caste as per old customs and usage of community and staying in Ahmedabad - Tribunal held that

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

5
Section 142(1)5
Depreciation5
Addition to Income5

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2202/AHD/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ADDL.CIT., RANGE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3254/AHD/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 722/AHD/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 118/AHD/2009[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1966/AHD/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2334/AHD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 199/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2201/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 441/AHD/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3126/AHD/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2765/AHD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2706/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1499/AHD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT., CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 442/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2916/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1281/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD vs. RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2489/AHD/2009[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

M/S. RAJKAMAL BUILDERS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT., CIRCLE-3(1)(2),, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2917/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page

RAJKAMAL BUILDER INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE JT.CIT.,(OSD)CIRCLE-5,, AHMEDABAD

In the result this ground of appeal preferred by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1385/AHD/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri (Dr.) Arjun Lal Saini & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Patel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.P. Singh, CIT-DR and Shri V.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80I

17A, page No.51 and 98 of the Tender documents. 22. So far as safety measures are concerned, the terms also stipulated that the assessee has to arrange for labours and also responsible for safety of all the concerned. In this regard the assessee has to take Workmen Compensation Insurance and also liable to pay compensation as per clause 36, page